Relationship Between Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Accelerometer-measured Physical Activity and Sleep in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia

Objective: Available treatment for chronic neuropathic pain is still limited, and the positive effects are modest. Thus, clinicians aim to improve activity and quality of life despite pain. The objective monitoring of activity is attracting attention in chronic pain assessments. Therefore, we objectively evaluated daytime activity and sleep in patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), using actigraphy to determine risk factors for decreased activity. Methods: Participants with PHN wore an actigraph (a wristwatch-like accelerometer) on the nondominant hand. The actigraph measured day-time activity and sleep, which were compared with participant-reported subjective pain and sleep assessments. Results: Fifty-four individuals with PHN who visited our outpatient clinic completed questionnaires and a week of actigraph monitoring. Subjective scores of pain intensity, neuropathic pain, disability in daily life, pain-catastrophizing thoughts, and insomnia were all well correlated. However, the actigraph-monitored activity levels, using 2 equations, and sleep quality were not associated with any pain or sleep-related subjective scores. Conclusion: The discrepancy between the subjective and objective scores in this study may be due to (1) features of PHN, an archetype of peripheral neuropathic pain affecting no motor nerves, (2) actigraph measurement limitations regarding the sedentary life of the elderly, or (3) activity misperception, a new proposition explaining the discrepancy between subjective and objective measures of activity, similar to the sleep state misperception. In patients with PHN, high pain intensity may be reported in those with highly maintained activity, in which treatment must be selected cautiously to prevent interruption of their physical abilities.