TY - JOUR
T1 - Review of the first comprehensive outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program in a tertiary care hospital in Japan
AU - Hase, Ryota
AU - Yokoyama, Yoshiaki
AU - Suzuki, Hiroyuki
AU - Uno, Shunsuke
AU - Mikawa, Takahiro
AU - Suzuki, Daisuke
AU - Muranaka, Kiyoharu
AU - Hosokawa, Naoto
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s)
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - Objectives: The infectious diseases team at Kameda Medical Center, Japan, implemented a new outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) program in July 2012 and expanded the program with the support of home care services. This study reviews the OPAT program after 5.5 years of operation. Methods: We prospectively collected data about the age, sex, diagnoses, causative organisms, types of OPAT, modes of administration, selected antibiotics, treatment durations, bed days saved, outcomes, readmissions, and estimated cost reductions of all patients who were treated in the OPAT program from July 2012 to December 2017. Results: Of the 66 patients treated under the OPAT program, 45 (68.2%) were treated using clinic OPAT, and 21 (31.8%) were treated using homecare OPAT. The most commonly targeted organism was methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Continuous infusion with elastomeric pumps was employed in 55 patients (83.3%). Cefazolin was the most frequently used antibiotic (39.4%), followed by penicillin G (24.2%). The median OPAT duration was 13 days (range, 3–51), and the total bed days saved was 923. The estimated medical cost reduction was approximately 87,000 US dollars. Conclusions: Our experience shows that OPAT is a safe and feasible practice not only for efficient bed utilization and medical cost savings but also for better antimicrobial stewardship.
AB - Objectives: The infectious diseases team at Kameda Medical Center, Japan, implemented a new outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) program in July 2012 and expanded the program with the support of home care services. This study reviews the OPAT program after 5.5 years of operation. Methods: We prospectively collected data about the age, sex, diagnoses, causative organisms, types of OPAT, modes of administration, selected antibiotics, treatment durations, bed days saved, outcomes, readmissions, and estimated cost reductions of all patients who were treated in the OPAT program from July 2012 to December 2017. Results: Of the 66 patients treated under the OPAT program, 45 (68.2%) were treated using clinic OPAT, and 21 (31.8%) were treated using homecare OPAT. The most commonly targeted organism was methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Continuous infusion with elastomeric pumps was employed in 55 patients (83.3%). Cefazolin was the most frequently used antibiotic (39.4%), followed by penicillin G (24.2%). The median OPAT duration was 13 days (range, 3–51), and the total bed days saved was 923. The estimated medical cost reduction was approximately 87,000 US dollars. Conclusions: Our experience shows that OPAT is a safe and feasible practice not only for efficient bed utilization and medical cost savings but also for better antimicrobial stewardship.
KW - Antimicrobial stewardship
KW - Bed days saved
KW - Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084073920&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084073920&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.033
DO - 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.033
M3 - Article
C2 - 32205285
AN - SCOPUS:85084073920
SN - 1201-9712
VL - 95
SP - 210
EP - 215
JO - International Journal of Infectious Diseases
JF - International Journal of Infectious Diseases
ER -