TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk of preterm birth after the excisional surgery for cervical lesions
T2 - a propensity-score matching study in Japan
AU - Miyakoshi, Kei
AU - Itakura, Atsuo
AU - Abe, Takayuki
AU - Kondoh, Eiji
AU - Terao, Yasuhisa
AU - Tabata, Tsutomu
AU - Hamada, Hiromi
AU - Tanaka, Kyoko
AU - Tanaka, Mamoru
AU - Kanayama, Naohiro
AU - Takeda, Satoru
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Introduction: There is a paucity of data on the risk of preterm birth subcategorized by gestational age in pregnancies after the pre-pregnancy excisional treatment for cervical lesions. In addition, little is known about the effect of prophylactic cerclage on the risk of preterm birth. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of preterm birth stratified by gestational period and its reduction by the prophylactic cerclage in women with prior excisional surgery. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of singleton pregnancies in the Japan Perinatal Registry Network Database (2013–2014, n = 307,001). Cases included pregnancies after the surgery (i.e. conization and loop electrosurgical excision procedure). Controls comprised the propensity-score matched pregnancies without pre-pregnancy surgery. The main outcome was the occurrence of preterm birth. The effect of prophylactic cervical cerclage on the risk of preterm birth after the excisional surgery was also examined using cases. Results: In the propensity-score matched population (cases, n = 1389; controls, n = 1389), cases exhibited a higher risk of preterm birth and preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM), compared with controls (preterm birth: 25.3 versus 10.6%; preterm PROM: 14.0 versus 3.5%: both p <.0001). Odds ratios (OR; 95% confidence interval [CI]) for preterm birth at 22–27 weeks, 28–31 weeks, 32–33 weeks, and 34–36 weeks were 3.4 [1.8–6.5], 4.6 [2.7–7.7], 2.2 [1.4–3.5], and 2.1 [1.6–2.7], respectively. The association was stronger for preterm PROM at earlier gestational age (22–27 weeks, 28–31 weeks, 32–33 weeks, and 34–36 weeks: 5.2 [2.3–11.8], 7.1 [3.4–15.0], 3.8 [1.7–8.3], and 3.9 [1.8–4.6], respectively). In cases, 171 underwent the prophylactic cervical cerclage. The occurrence of preterm birth and preterm PROM was comparable between those with and without the cerclage (28.7 versus 24.2, and 12.9 versus 13.3%, respectively). Conclusions: Pre-pregnancy excisional cervical surgery was associated with the increased risk of preterm birth, especially before 32 weeks of gestation. The prophylactic cerclage did not reduce the risk of preterm birth.
AB - Introduction: There is a paucity of data on the risk of preterm birth subcategorized by gestational age in pregnancies after the pre-pregnancy excisional treatment for cervical lesions. In addition, little is known about the effect of prophylactic cerclage on the risk of preterm birth. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of preterm birth stratified by gestational period and its reduction by the prophylactic cerclage in women with prior excisional surgery. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of singleton pregnancies in the Japan Perinatal Registry Network Database (2013–2014, n = 307,001). Cases included pregnancies after the surgery (i.e. conization and loop electrosurgical excision procedure). Controls comprised the propensity-score matched pregnancies without pre-pregnancy surgery. The main outcome was the occurrence of preterm birth. The effect of prophylactic cervical cerclage on the risk of preterm birth after the excisional surgery was also examined using cases. Results: In the propensity-score matched population (cases, n = 1389; controls, n = 1389), cases exhibited a higher risk of preterm birth and preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM), compared with controls (preterm birth: 25.3 versus 10.6%; preterm PROM: 14.0 versus 3.5%: both p <.0001). Odds ratios (OR; 95% confidence interval [CI]) for preterm birth at 22–27 weeks, 28–31 weeks, 32–33 weeks, and 34–36 weeks were 3.4 [1.8–6.5], 4.6 [2.7–7.7], 2.2 [1.4–3.5], and 2.1 [1.6–2.7], respectively. The association was stronger for preterm PROM at earlier gestational age (22–27 weeks, 28–31 weeks, 32–33 weeks, and 34–36 weeks: 5.2 [2.3–11.8], 7.1 [3.4–15.0], 3.8 [1.7–8.3], and 3.9 [1.8–4.6], respectively). In cases, 171 underwent the prophylactic cervical cerclage. The occurrence of preterm birth and preterm PROM was comparable between those with and without the cerclage (28.7 versus 24.2, and 12.9 versus 13.3%, respectively). Conclusions: Pre-pregnancy excisional cervical surgery was associated with the increased risk of preterm birth, especially before 32 weeks of gestation. The prophylactic cerclage did not reduce the risk of preterm birth.
KW - Cervical cerclage
KW - cervical lesions
KW - excisional surgery
KW - prelabor rupture of membranes
KW - preterm birth
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066808819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066808819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14767058.2019.1619687
DO - 10.1080/14767058.2019.1619687
M3 - Article
C2 - 31092078
AN - SCOPUS:85066808819
SN - 1476-7058
VL - 34
SP - 845
EP - 851
JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
IS - 6
ER -