TY - GEN
T1 - Robust offset locking of laser frequency with electronically tunable LC circuits for sub-millihertz uncertainty
AU - Hasegawa, Taro
AU - Seishu, Yuhei
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - Laser frequency stabilization is one of the essential technique in atomic, molecular, and optical physics, quantum optics, optical communications, and fundamental physics. Optical offset locking is the technique to stabilize optical frequency of a single-mode laser (slave laser) with respect to another well-stabilized laser (master laser). Optical phase lock loop (OPLL) [1] is one of the offset locking schemes, with which the slave laser frequency can be stabilized very precisely (less than the uncertainty of 10-18). However, especially in noisy experimental circumstances, the OPLL does not work because its capture range is not so wide that the locking fails for large amount of frequency jitters. In order to keep the locked condition, another offset locking with wider capture range is sometimes required. Examples of such locking schemes are digital processing technique, optical frequency locking to resonance frequency of a high-finesse cavity [2], offset locking with an electrical delay line [3], and offset locking with electric LC resonant circuit [4]. The offset locking with the electric LC circuit (LC locking) has been introduced by W.-Y. Cheng et al, and with employing this scheme with the OPLL the beat-note frequency can be stabilized as precise as one millihertz.
AB - Laser frequency stabilization is one of the essential technique in atomic, molecular, and optical physics, quantum optics, optical communications, and fundamental physics. Optical offset locking is the technique to stabilize optical frequency of a single-mode laser (slave laser) with respect to another well-stabilized laser (master laser). Optical phase lock loop (OPLL) [1] is one of the offset locking schemes, with which the slave laser frequency can be stabilized very precisely (less than the uncertainty of 10-18). However, especially in noisy experimental circumstances, the OPLL does not work because its capture range is not so wide that the locking fails for large amount of frequency jitters. In order to keep the locked condition, another offset locking with wider capture range is sometimes required. Examples of such locking schemes are digital processing technique, optical frequency locking to resonance frequency of a high-finesse cavity [2], offset locking with an electrical delay line [3], and offset locking with electric LC resonant circuit [4]. The offset locking with the electric LC circuit (LC locking) has been introduced by W.-Y. Cheng et al, and with employing this scheme with the OPLL the beat-note frequency can be stabilized as precise as one millihertz.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074646027&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074646027&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/CLEOE-EQEC.2019.8872639
DO - 10.1109/CLEOE-EQEC.2019.8872639
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85074646027
T3 - 2019 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe and European Quantum Electronics Conference, CLEO/Europe-EQEC 2019
BT - 2019 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe and European Quantum Electronics Conference, CLEO/Europe-EQEC 2019
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2019 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe and European Quantum Electronics Conference, CLEO/Europe-EQEC 2019
Y2 - 23 June 2019 through 27 June 2019
ER -