TY - JOUR
T1 - Role for presupplementary motor area in inhibition of cognitive set interference
AU - Konishi, Seiki
AU - Watanabe, Takamitsu
AU - Jimura, Koji
AU - Chikazoe, Junichi
AU - Hirose, Satoshi
AU - Kimura, Hiroko M.
AU - Miyashita, Yasushi
PY - 2011/3
Y1 - 2011/3
N2 - Proactive interference (PI), which is formed through repetition of certain behavior and lasts for a while, needs to be inhibited in order for subsequent behavior to prevail over the antecedent one. Although the inhibitory mechanisms in the pFC have been reported that are recruited long after one behavior is updated to another, very little is known about the inhibitorymechanisms that are recruited immediately after the update. The WCST was modified in the present fMRI study such that inhibition of PI could be examined both immediately after and long after update of behavior. Use of "dual-match" stimuli allowed us to compare two types of trials where inhibition of PI was and was not required (control and release trials, respectively). Significant activation was observed in the left pre-SMA during control versus release trials. The pre-SMA activation was selective to PI inhibition required immediately after update of behavior, which exhibited marked contrast to the left anterior prefrontal activation selective to PI inhibition required long after the update. These results reveal dissociable inhibitory mechanisms in these two regions that are recruited in the different temporal contexts of the inhibitory demands imposed during performance of the task.
AB - Proactive interference (PI), which is formed through repetition of certain behavior and lasts for a while, needs to be inhibited in order for subsequent behavior to prevail over the antecedent one. Although the inhibitory mechanisms in the pFC have been reported that are recruited long after one behavior is updated to another, very little is known about the inhibitorymechanisms that are recruited immediately after the update. The WCST was modified in the present fMRI study such that inhibition of PI could be examined both immediately after and long after update of behavior. Use of "dual-match" stimuli allowed us to compare two types of trials where inhibition of PI was and was not required (control and release trials, respectively). Significant activation was observed in the left pre-SMA during control versus release trials. The pre-SMA activation was selective to PI inhibition required immediately after update of behavior, which exhibited marked contrast to the left anterior prefrontal activation selective to PI inhibition required long after the update. These results reveal dissociable inhibitory mechanisms in these two regions that are recruited in the different temporal contexts of the inhibitory demands imposed during performance of the task.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650317056&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650317056&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1162/jocn.2010.21480
DO - 10.1162/jocn.2010.21480
M3 - Article
C2 - 20350186
AN - SCOPUS:78650317056
SN - 0898-929X
VL - 23
SP - 737
EP - 745
JO - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
JF - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
IS - 3
ER -