TY - GEN
T1 - Selecting an appropriate routing protocol for in-field MANEMO experiments
AU - Tazaki, Hajime
AU - Van Meter, Rodney
AU - Wakikawa, Ryuji
AU - Wongsaardsakul, Thirapon
AU - Kanchanasut, Kanchana
AU - Dias De Amorim, Marcelo
AU - Murai, Jun
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Despite years of research in ad hoc routing protocols, only a few have been investigated in the context of MANEMO (MANET for NEMO), which provides a hierarchical structured network and global connectivity. Motivated by the deployment of post-disaster MANEMOs composed of mobile routers and stations, we evaluate two candidate routing protocols through analytical models, simulation, and field experiments. The first protocol is the widely adopted Optimized Link State Routing protocol (OLSR) and the second is the combination of the Tree Discovery Protocol (TDP) with Network In Node Advertisement (NINA). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that these two protocols are compared in both theoretical and practical terms. We focus on the control overhead generated when nodes perform a handover. Our results confirm the correctness and operational robustness of both protocols. More interestingly, although in the general case OLSR leads to better results, TDP/NINA outperforms OLSR in the case of sparse networks, which corresponds to the operation point of our target scenario.
AB - Despite years of research in ad hoc routing protocols, only a few have been investigated in the context of MANEMO (MANET for NEMO), which provides a hierarchical structured network and global connectivity. Motivated by the deployment of post-disaster MANEMOs composed of mobile routers and stations, we evaluate two candidate routing protocols through analytical models, simulation, and field experiments. The first protocol is the widely adopted Optimized Link State Routing protocol (OLSR) and the second is the combination of the Tree Discovery Protocol (TDP) with Network In Node Advertisement (NINA). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that these two protocols are compared in both theoretical and practical terms. We focus on the control overhead generated when nodes perform a handover. Our results confirm the correctness and operational robustness of both protocols. More interestingly, although in the general case OLSR leads to better results, TDP/NINA outperforms OLSR in the case of sparse networks, which corresponds to the operation point of our target scenario.
KW - Field experiments
KW - MANEMO
KW - Routing
KW - Simulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74049117984&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74049117984&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/1641876.1641895
DO - 10.1145/1641876.1641895
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:74049117984
SN - 9781605586182
T3 - PE-WASUN'09 - Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad-Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks
SP - 101
EP - 107
BT - PE-WASUN'09 - Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad-Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks
T2 - 6th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad-Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks, PE-WASUN'09
Y2 - 28 October 2009 through 29 October 2009
ER -