TY - JOUR
T1 - Self-control and impulsiveness with asynchronous presentation of reinforcement schedules
AU - Ishii, Taku
AU - Sakagami, Takayuki
N1 - Funding Information:
The research was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (c) from Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (13610098). Portions of these data were included in the master's thesis submitted by the first author to Keio University. The authors thank Orn Bragason, Leonard Green, and Allen Neuringer for their helpful advice.
PY - 2002/7/31
Y1 - 2002/7/31
N2 - In discrete trials, pigeons were presented with two alternatives: to wait for a larger reinforcer, or to respond and obtain a smaller reinforcer immediately. The choice of the former was defined as self-control, and the choice of the latter as impulsiveness. The stimulus that set the opportunity for an impulsive choice was presented after a set interval from the onset of the stimulus that signaled the waiting period. That interval increased or decreased from session to session so that the opportunity for an impulsive choice became available either more removed from or closer in time to the presentation of the larger reinforcer. In three separate conditions, the larger reinforcer was delivered according to either a fixed interval (FI) schedule, a fixed time (FT) schedule, or a differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO) schedule. The results showed that impulsive choices increased as the opportunity for such a choice was more distant in time from presentation of the larger reinforcer. Although the schedule of the larger reinforcer affected the rate of response in the waiting period, the responses themselves had no effect on choice unless the responses postponed presentation of the larger reinforcer.
AB - In discrete trials, pigeons were presented with two alternatives: to wait for a larger reinforcer, or to respond and obtain a smaller reinforcer immediately. The choice of the former was defined as self-control, and the choice of the latter as impulsiveness. The stimulus that set the opportunity for an impulsive choice was presented after a set interval from the onset of the stimulus that signaled the waiting period. That interval increased or decreased from session to session so that the opportunity for an impulsive choice became available either more removed from or closer in time to the presentation of the larger reinforcer. In three separate conditions, the larger reinforcer was delivered according to either a fixed interval (FI) schedule, a fixed time (FT) schedule, or a differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO) schedule. The results showed that impulsive choices increased as the opportunity for such a choice was more distant in time from presentation of the larger reinforcer. Although the schedule of the larger reinforcer affected the rate of response in the waiting period, the responses themselves had no effect on choice unless the responses postponed presentation of the larger reinforcer.
KW - Impulsiveness
KW - Key peck
KW - Pigeon
KW - Schedule of reinforcement
KW - Self-control
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037205799&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037205799&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00059-1
DO - 10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00059-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0037205799
SN - 0376-6357
VL - 59
SP - 25
EP - 35
JO - Behavioural Processes
JF - Behavioural Processes
IS - 1
ER -