TY - JOUR
T1 - Significance of histology and nodal status on the survival of women with early-stage cervical cancer
T2 - validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system
AU - Machida, Hiroko
AU - Matsuo, Koji
AU - Kobayashi, Yoichi
AU - Momomura, Mai
AU - Takahashi, Fumiaki
AU - Tabata, Tsutomu
AU - Kondo, Eiji
AU - Yamagami, Wataru
AU - Ebina, Yasuhiko
AU - Kaneuchi, Masanori
AU - Nagase, Satoru
AU - Mikami, Mikio
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the member institutions of the JSOG for their cooperation in providing the data for patients with gynecological tumors. Also, the authors would like to thank all the members of the Committee on Gynecological Oncology at JSOG, as well as Dr. Matsuo M.D, PhD for his scientific input.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Objective: To assess the efficacy of the FIGO 2018 classification system for nodal-specific classifications for early-stage cervical cancer; specifically, to examine the impact of nodal metastasis on survival and the effect of postoperative treatments, according to histological subtypes. Methods: This society-based retrospective observational study in Japan examined 16,539 women with the 2009 FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer who underwent primary surgical treatment from 2004 to 2015. Associations of cause-specific survival (CSS) with nodal metastasis and postoperative adjuvant therapy were examined according to histology type (squamous cell carcinoma [SCC], n=10,315; and non-SCC, n=6,224). Results: The nodal metastasis rate for SCC was higher than that for non-SCC (10.7% vs. 8.3%, p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, the impact of nodal metastasis on CSS was greater for non-SCC tumors (adjusted-hazard ratio [HR], 3.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.40– 4.02) than for SCC tumors (adjusted-HR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.70–2.84; p<0.001). Propensity score matching analysis showed significantly lower CSS rates for women with pelvic nodal metastasis from non-SCC tumors than from SCC tumors (5-year CSS rate, 75.4% vs. 90.3%, p<0.001).The CSS rates for women with nodal metastasis in SCC histology were similar between the postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy and chemotherapy groups (89.2% vs. 86.1%, p=0.42), whereas those in non-SCC histology who received postoperative chemotherapy improved the CSS (74.1% vs. 67.7%, p=0.043). Conclusion: The node-specific staging system in the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer classification is applicable to both non-SCC tumors and SCC tumors; however, the prognostic significance of nodal metastases and efficacy of postoperative therapies vary according to histology.
AB - Objective: To assess the efficacy of the FIGO 2018 classification system for nodal-specific classifications for early-stage cervical cancer; specifically, to examine the impact of nodal metastasis on survival and the effect of postoperative treatments, according to histological subtypes. Methods: This society-based retrospective observational study in Japan examined 16,539 women with the 2009 FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer who underwent primary surgical treatment from 2004 to 2015. Associations of cause-specific survival (CSS) with nodal metastasis and postoperative adjuvant therapy were examined according to histology type (squamous cell carcinoma [SCC], n=10,315; and non-SCC, n=6,224). Results: The nodal metastasis rate for SCC was higher than that for non-SCC (10.7% vs. 8.3%, p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, the impact of nodal metastasis on CSS was greater for non-SCC tumors (adjusted-hazard ratio [HR], 3.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.40– 4.02) than for SCC tumors (adjusted-HR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.70–2.84; p<0.001). Propensity score matching analysis showed significantly lower CSS rates for women with pelvic nodal metastasis from non-SCC tumors than from SCC tumors (5-year CSS rate, 75.4% vs. 90.3%, p<0.001).The CSS rates for women with nodal metastasis in SCC histology were similar between the postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy and chemotherapy groups (89.2% vs. 86.1%, p=0.42), whereas those in non-SCC histology who received postoperative chemotherapy improved the CSS (74.1% vs. 67.7%, p=0.043). Conclusion: The node-specific staging system in the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer classification is applicable to both non-SCC tumors and SCC tumors; however, the prognostic significance of nodal metastases and efficacy of postoperative therapies vary according to histology.
KW - Histological Type of Neoplasm
KW - Lymph Node Metastasis
KW - Neoplasm Staging
KW - Survival
KW - Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128801446&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85128801446&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e26
DO - 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e26
M3 - Article
C2 - 35320882
AN - SCOPUS:85128801446
SN - 2005-0380
VL - 33
JO - Journal of gynecologic oncology
JF - Journal of gynecologic oncology
IS - 3
M1 - e26
ER -