Significance of the surgical hepatic resection margin in patients with a single hepatocellular carcinoma

on behalf of the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Citations (Scopus)


Background: The impact of a wide surgical margin on the outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been evaluated in relation to the type of liver resection performed, anatomical or non-anatomical. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of surgical margin status on outcomes in patients undergoing anatomical or non-anatomical resection for solitary HCC. Methods: Data from patients with solitary HCC who had undergone non-anatomical partial resection (Hr0 group) or anatomical resection of one Couinaud segment (HrS group) between 2000 and 2007 were extracted from a nationwide survey database in Japan. Overall and recurrence-free survival associated with the surgical margin status and width were evaluated in the two groups. Results: A total of 4457 patients were included in the Hr0 group and 3507 in the HrS group. A microscopically positive surgical margin was associated with poor overall survival in both groups. A negative but 0-mm surgical margin was associated with poorer overall and recurrence-free survival than a wider margin only in the Hr0 group. In the HrS group, the width of the surgical margin was not associated with patient outcome. Conclusion: Anatomical resection with a negative 0-mm surgical margin may be acceptable. Non-anatomical resection with a negative 0-mm margin was associated with a less favourable survival outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-120
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2020 Jan 1

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Significance of the surgical hepatic resection margin in patients with a single hepatocellular carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this