SOCS3 negatively regulates the gp130-STAT3 pathway in mouse skin wound healing

Bing Mei Zhu, Yuko Ishida, Gertraud W. Robinson, Margit Pacher-Zavisin, Akihiko Yoshimura, Philip M. Murphy, Lothar Hennighausen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes during wound healing are regulated by cytokines and chemokines, which are secreted by resident and inflammatory cells and activate the transcription factor signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3. However, it is not clear to what extent STAT3 in keratinocytes is activated by gp130-containing receptors. We addressed this question genetically by deleting the suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS)3, a negative regulator of gp130-mediated STAT3 activation. Socs3 alleles flanked by loxP sites were deleted in mice with either an MMTV-Cre or K5-Cre transgene. While both transgenes are active in keratinocytes, the MMTV-Cre deletes floxed genes also in immune cells. Deletion of Socs3 using the MMTV-Cre transgene resulted in aberrant STAT3 activation, impaired wound healing, prolonged secretion of chemokines, a hyperproliferative epidermis, and neutrophil infiltration into wounds. Simultaneous deletion of the Socs3 and gp130 genes restored normal wound healing. Moreover, deletion of Socs3 only in keratinocytes caused impaired wound healing. These results demonstrate that wound healing is controlled in keratinocytes by the gp130-SOCS3-STAT3 pathway and an imbalance of this pathway results in delayed wound healing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1821-1829
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Investigative Dermatology
Volume128
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Jul
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Dermatology
  • Cell Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'SOCS3 negatively regulates the gp130-STAT3 pathway in mouse skin wound healing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this