TY - JOUR
T1 - Studies on the light‐focusing plastic rod. XIII. Photocopolymerization of methyl methacrylate–vinyl esters of aromatic carboxylic acid
AU - Koike, Yasuhiro
AU - Kimoto, Yoshihiko
AU - Ohtsuka, Yasuji
PY - 1982/9
Y1 - 1982/9
N2 - The light‐focusing plastic rod (LFR) was prepared by the photocopolymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) with vinyl phenylacetate (VPAc) and vinyl benzoate (VB), using benzoyl peroxide (BPO), benzoin (BN), and benzoin methyl ether (BME) as an initiator. The LFR with high transparency and steep refractive‐index distribution was obtained using the MMA–VPAc pair and the BME. The difference in the index distributions under BPO, BN, and BME initiations was clarified in terms of the photoinitiation rate and the accompanying thermal polymerization during the photocopolymerization process. The light scattering intensity from the LFR was related to the heterogeneity of the copolymer composition and the compatibility between the M1 and M2 polymers. The comparison of the light scattering theory with the experimental data indicated that the much less scattering intensity from the MMA–VPAc LFR than the MMA–VB LFR should be attributed to the good compatibility between the MMA and VPAc polymers, and scarcely attributed to the index difference between the VPAc and VB polymers.
AB - The light‐focusing plastic rod (LFR) was prepared by the photocopolymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) with vinyl phenylacetate (VPAc) and vinyl benzoate (VB), using benzoyl peroxide (BPO), benzoin (BN), and benzoin methyl ether (BME) as an initiator. The LFR with high transparency and steep refractive‐index distribution was obtained using the MMA–VPAc pair and the BME. The difference in the index distributions under BPO, BN, and BME initiations was clarified in terms of the photoinitiation rate and the accompanying thermal polymerization during the photocopolymerization process. The light scattering intensity from the LFR was related to the heterogeneity of the copolymer composition and the compatibility between the M1 and M2 polymers. The comparison of the light scattering theory with the experimental data indicated that the much less scattering intensity from the MMA–VPAc LFR than the MMA–VB LFR should be attributed to the good compatibility between the MMA and VPAc polymers, and scarcely attributed to the index difference between the VPAc and VB polymers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020180288&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020180288&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/app.1982.070270906
DO - 10.1002/app.1982.070270906
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0020180288
SN - 0021-8995
VL - 27
SP - 3253
EP - 3264
JO - Journal of Applied Polymer Science
JF - Journal of Applied Polymer Science
IS - 9
ER -