Abstract
Toward low-carbon society, much higher use of renewable energy and unused energy should be promoted. For this purpose, area-wide energy utilization is expected to play an important role in commercial and residential sectors. Along with the compact city policy, area-wide energy utilization in rather wide scale such as in a community and in a city should be strategically planned and implemented. Among various carbon reduction measures, those of higher reduction potential and higher cost-benefit ratio should be prioritized. This paper describes an appropriate way of determining the priority by use of marginal abatement cost (MAC), taking the following viewpoints into consideration.; 1) Setting payback-periods based on functional lifetime of each reduction measure 2) Qualifying non-energy benefits (NEB) to be deducted from the MAC of each reduction measure A case study for a community-scale energy utilization by use of incineration waste heat is undertaken to validate the above concept.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 915-921 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Journal of Environmental Engineering |
| Volume | 75 |
| Issue number | 656 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 Oct |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Area-wide energy utilization
- Cost benefit ratio
- Marginal abatement cost
- Non-energy benefit
- Payback time
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Engineering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Study on non-energy benefits (neb) by area-wide energy utilization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS