TY - JOUR
T1 - Survey on the current status of the indication and implementation protocols for bile replacement in patients with external biliary drainage with special reference to infection control
AU - Shinkawa, Hiroji
AU - Kubo, Shoji
AU - Mikamo, Hiroshige
AU - Matsuda, Naoyuki
AU - Omura, Kenji
AU - Okamoto, Kohji
AU - Ono, Satoshi
AU - Obara, Hideaki
AU - Kobayashi, Minako
AU - Sasaki, Junichi
AU - Shimizu, Junzo
AU - Sueyoshi, Susumu
AU - Yoshida, Junichi
AU - Watanabe, Manabu
AU - Takesue, Yoshio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Purpose: This survey of bile replacement (BR) was conducted on patients with external biliary drainage to assess the current status of indication and implementation protocol of BR with special reference to infection control. Methods: A 12-item questionnaire regarding the performance of perioperative BR was sent to 124 institutions in Japan. Results: BR was performed in 29 institutions, and the indication protocol was introduced in 19. BR was performed preoperatively in 11 institutions, pre- and postoperatively in 12, and postoperatively in 6. The methods used for BR administration included oral intake (n = 10), nasogastric tube (n = 1), enteral nutrition tube (n = 3), oral intake and enteral nutrition tube (n = 6), oral intake or nasogastric tube (n = 2), nasogastric tube and enteral nutrition tube (n = 2), and oral intake or nasogastric tube and enteral nutrition tube (n = 5). In 10 of 29 institutions, isolation of multidrug-resistant organisms and a high bacterial load were considered contraindications for the use of BR. Seven institutions experienced environmental contamination. Conclusions: Given the different implementation of BR among institutions, the appropriate indication and protocols for BR should be established for infection control.
AB - Purpose: This survey of bile replacement (BR) was conducted on patients with external biliary drainage to assess the current status of indication and implementation protocol of BR with special reference to infection control. Methods: A 12-item questionnaire regarding the performance of perioperative BR was sent to 124 institutions in Japan. Results: BR was performed in 29 institutions, and the indication protocol was introduced in 19. BR was performed preoperatively in 11 institutions, pre- and postoperatively in 12, and postoperatively in 6. The methods used for BR administration included oral intake (n = 10), nasogastric tube (n = 1), enteral nutrition tube (n = 3), oral intake and enteral nutrition tube (n = 6), oral intake or nasogastric tube (n = 2), nasogastric tube and enteral nutrition tube (n = 2), and oral intake or nasogastric tube and enteral nutrition tube (n = 5). In 10 of 29 institutions, isolation of multidrug-resistant organisms and a high bacterial load were considered contraindications for the use of BR. Seven institutions experienced environmental contamination. Conclusions: Given the different implementation of BR among institutions, the appropriate indication and protocols for BR should be established for infection control.
KW - Bacterial load
KW - Bile replacement
KW - External biliary drainage
KW - Indication
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124733408&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124733408&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00595-022-02475-x
DO - 10.1007/s00595-022-02475-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 35182252
AN - SCOPUS:85124733408
SN - 0941-1291
VL - 52
SP - 1446
EP - 1452
JO - Surgery today
JF - Surgery today
IS - 10
ER -