TY - JOUR
T1 - Techniques for splenic vein reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer
AU - Ono, Yoshihiro
AU - Tanaka, Masayuki
AU - Matsueda, Kiyoshi
AU - Hiratsuka, Makiko
AU - Takahashi, Yu
AU - Mise, Yoshihiro
AU - Inoue, Yosuke
AU - Sato, Takafumi
AU - Ito, Hiromichi
AU - Saiura, Akio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - Background: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with splenic vein (SV) ligation may result in sinistral portal hypertension (SPH). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of various types of SV reconstruction to prevent SPH and to define the optimal reconstruction method. Methods: This study included patients who underwent PD with SV resection and reconstruction for pancreatic cancer between December 2013 and June 2017. The patency of various types of SV anastomosis and SPH was evaluated by follow up computed tomography. Results: The type of SV reconstruction was divided into two groups: (i) end-to-side anastomosis (n = 10), in which the SV was anastomosed with either the left renal vein (LRV; n = 8) or portal vein (n = 2); and (ii) end-to-end anastomosis (n = 20), in which the SV was anastomosed with another smaller vein or graft. The patency rate for Group 1 was 90% (9/10), compared with 45% (9/20) for Group 2 (P = 0.024). Half the patients in whom the SV anastomosis was occluded (6/12) developed gastrointestinal varices, whereas only 11% of patients with a patent SV anastomosis (2/9) had varices (P = 0.034). Conclusion: SV-LRV reconstruction is widely applicable, effectively reduces the risk of SPH, and should be considered for the case of extended PD.
AB - Background: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with splenic vein (SV) ligation may result in sinistral portal hypertension (SPH). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of various types of SV reconstruction to prevent SPH and to define the optimal reconstruction method. Methods: This study included patients who underwent PD with SV resection and reconstruction for pancreatic cancer between December 2013 and June 2017. The patency of various types of SV anastomosis and SPH was evaluated by follow up computed tomography. Results: The type of SV reconstruction was divided into two groups: (i) end-to-side anastomosis (n = 10), in which the SV was anastomosed with either the left renal vein (LRV; n = 8) or portal vein (n = 2); and (ii) end-to-end anastomosis (n = 20), in which the SV was anastomosed with another smaller vein or graft. The patency rate for Group 1 was 90% (9/10), compared with 45% (9/20) for Group 2 (P = 0.024). Half the patients in whom the SV anastomosis was occluded (6/12) developed gastrointestinal varices, whereas only 11% of patients with a patent SV anastomosis (2/9) had varices (P = 0.034). Conclusion: SV-LRV reconstruction is widely applicable, effectively reduces the risk of SPH, and should be considered for the case of extended PD.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062696964&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062696964&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.01.017
DO - 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.01.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 30878491
AN - SCOPUS:85062696964
SN - 1365-182X
VL - 21
SP - 1288
EP - 1294
JO - HPB
JF - HPB
IS - 10
ER -