TY - JOUR
T1 - Technology transfer in ASEAN countries
T2 - some evidence from buyer-provided training network data
AU - Kimura, Fukunari
AU - Machikita, Tomohiro
AU - Ueki, Yasushi
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors especially thank Yutaka Arimoto, Momoko Kawakami, Keiko Ito, Yoichi Sugita, Mari Tanaka, Willem Thorbecke, Kazunari Tsukada, and Shujiro Urata for their insightful inputs and comments and the seminar participants at IDE-JETRO and The East Asian Economic Association (EAEA), 2014, for helpful comments. This project could not have been carried out without cooperation from the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) of Indonesia, the Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), the Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology (SIIT), Thammasat University of Thailand, the Institute for Industry Policy and Strategy (IPSI), Ministry of Industry and Trade of Vietnam, Bangkok Research Center of IDE-JETRO, and Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), who provided financial support for our questionnaire survey. Support for Machikita’s and Ueki’s research from JSPS (nos. 21320212 and 25380559) is also gratefully acknowledged. We are solely responsible for any errors that may remain.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2016/8/1
Y1 - 2016/8/1
N2 - Technology transfers are important channels for firms in developing countries to get access to new technology and initiate innovation. This article examines the geographical pattern of technology transfers in the form of buyer-provided training in domestic and international production networks. Our unique buyer-supplier network data in four countries in Southeast Asia allow us to directly observe the buyer-supplier relationship as well as the existence of inter-firm provision of training for product/process innovation in order to investigate the geographical structure of knowledge acquisition, dissemination, and aggregation among local and non-local firms. The empirical analysis finds the following: (1) the probability of having training provided by the main buyer presents a U-shaped quadratic pattern with respect to the geographical distance between the respondent firms and the main buyers. The geographical proximity to the main buyer seems to be particularly important for local firms. (2) The training provision is likely for both local and non-local firms when the main buyer is a multinational located in the same country. (3) The probability of having training from the main buyer is high when the main buyer conducts R&D. (4) Both local and non-local firms that have training provided by their main buyers are likely to provide training to their main suppliers. (5) In the case of non-local firms, product innovation with production partners is more likely when they have upstream/downstream training. However, such links seem to be weaker in the case of local firms.
AB - Technology transfers are important channels for firms in developing countries to get access to new technology and initiate innovation. This article examines the geographical pattern of technology transfers in the form of buyer-provided training in domestic and international production networks. Our unique buyer-supplier network data in four countries in Southeast Asia allow us to directly observe the buyer-supplier relationship as well as the existence of inter-firm provision of training for product/process innovation in order to investigate the geographical structure of knowledge acquisition, dissemination, and aggregation among local and non-local firms. The empirical analysis finds the following: (1) the probability of having training provided by the main buyer presents a U-shaped quadratic pattern with respect to the geographical distance between the respondent firms and the main buyers. The geographical proximity to the main buyer seems to be particularly important for local firms. (2) The training provision is likely for both local and non-local firms when the main buyer is a multinational located in the same country. (3) The probability of having training from the main buyer is high when the main buyer conducts R&D. (4) Both local and non-local firms that have training provided by their main buyers are likely to provide training to their main suppliers. (5) In the case of non-local firms, product innovation with production partners is more likely when they have upstream/downstream training. However, such links seem to be weaker in the case of local firms.
KW - Backward linkages
KW - Buyer-provided training
KW - FDI spillovers
KW - Southeast Asia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931864952&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931864952&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10644-015-9163-9
DO - 10.1007/s10644-015-9163-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84931864952
SN - 1573-9414
VL - 49
SP - 195
EP - 219
JO - Economic Change and Restructuring
JF - Economic Change and Restructuring
IS - 2-3
ER -