TY - JOUR
T1 - The present situation of home blood pressure measurement among outpatients in Japan
AU - Noda, Aoi
AU - Obara, Taku
AU - Abe, Shinya
AU - Yoshimachi, Shoko
AU - Satoh, Michihiro
AU - Ishikuro, Mami
AU - Hara, Azusa
AU - Metoki, Hirohito
AU - Mano, Nariyasu
AU - Ohkubo, Takayoshi
AU - Goto, Teruaki
AU - Imai, Yutaka
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2020/1/2
Y1 - 2020/1/2
N2 - Objective: To clarify the present situation of home blood pressure (HBP) measurement among Japanese patients. Methods: A nationwide questionnaire survey regarding HBP measurement was conducted on patients aged 20 years or older who had visited 20 community pharmacies to have their prescriptions filled. Results: In total, 76.7% of 1,103 hypertensives and 40.9% of 1,106 normotensives had their own devices for HBP measurement. Compared with normotensives, a higher proportion of hypertensives recognized the guideline-based reference values for HBP and clinic BP. Compared with hypertensives who did not have a physician’s recommendation, those who did more often had their own devices, recognized the guideline-based reference values for HBP, and measured HBP every day (70.4%, 1.5%, and 31.6% vs. 91.1%, 6.9%, and 65.4%, respectively). Among 793 hypertensives who measured HBP, a higher proportion of those with a physician’s recommendation measured HBP according to optimal guideline-based procedures compared with those without. Among 560 hypertensives who recorded HBP readings, a higher proportion of those with a physician’s recommendation (74.6%) showed all HBP readings to their physicians compared with those without (35.3%). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that physicians should recommend measuring HBP in accordance with the Japanese Society of Hypertension guidelines more aggressively, and provide more detailed explanations to patients regarding how to measure HBP.
AB - Objective: To clarify the present situation of home blood pressure (HBP) measurement among Japanese patients. Methods: A nationwide questionnaire survey regarding HBP measurement was conducted on patients aged 20 years or older who had visited 20 community pharmacies to have their prescriptions filled. Results: In total, 76.7% of 1,103 hypertensives and 40.9% of 1,106 normotensives had their own devices for HBP measurement. Compared with normotensives, a higher proportion of hypertensives recognized the guideline-based reference values for HBP and clinic BP. Compared with hypertensives who did not have a physician’s recommendation, those who did more often had their own devices, recognized the guideline-based reference values for HBP, and measured HBP every day (70.4%, 1.5%, and 31.6% vs. 91.1%, 6.9%, and 65.4%, respectively). Among 793 hypertensives who measured HBP, a higher proportion of those with a physician’s recommendation measured HBP according to optimal guideline-based procedures compared with those without. Among 560 hypertensives who recorded HBP readings, a higher proportion of those with a physician’s recommendation (74.6%) showed all HBP readings to their physicians compared with those without (35.3%). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that physicians should recommend measuring HBP in accordance with the Japanese Society of Hypertension guidelines more aggressively, and provide more detailed explanations to patients regarding how to measure HBP.
KW - Guidelines
KW - awareness
KW - home blood pressure measurement
KW - outpatients
KW - questionnaire survey
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061578677&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061578677&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10641963.2019.1571601
DO - 10.1080/10641963.2019.1571601
M3 - Article
C2 - 30760048
AN - SCOPUS:85061578677
SN - 1064-1963
VL - 42
SP - 67
EP - 74
JO - Clinical and Experimental Hypertension
JF - Clinical and Experimental Hypertension
IS - 1
ER -