Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Therapeutic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with febrile neutropenia: a comprehensive systematic review for clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022 from the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology

  • Kenji Tsuchihashi
  • , Mamoru Ito
  • , Yuta Okumura
  • , Kenta Nio
  • , Yukinori Ozaki
  • , Hiroshi Nishio
  • , Eiki Ichihara
  • , Yuji Miura
  • , Makoto Endo
  • , Shingo Yano
  • , Dai Maruyama
  • , Tetsuhiro Yoshinami
  • , Nobuyuki Susumu
  • , Munetaka Takekuma
  • , Takashi Motohashi
  • , Nobuaki Ochi
  • , Toshio Kubo
  • , Keita Uchino
  • , Takahiro Kimura
  • , Yutaro Kamiyama
  • Shinji Nakao, Shinobu Tamura, Hitomi Nishimoto, Yasuhisa Kato, Atsushi Sato, Toshimi Takano, Eishi Baba

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Febrile neutropenia represents a critical oncologic emergency, and its management is pivotal in cancer therapy. In several guidelines, the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia is not routinely recommended except in high-risk cases. The Japan Society of Clinical Oncology has updated its clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF, incorporating a systematic review to address this clinical question. Methods: The systematic review was conducted by performing a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web, focusing on publications from January 1990 to December 2019. Selected studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, and cohort and case–control studies. Evaluated outcomes included overall survival, infection-related mortality, hospitalization duration, quality of life, and pain. Results: The initial search yielded 332 records. Following two rounds of screening, two records were selected for both qualitative and quantitative synthesis including meta-analysis. Regarding infection-related mortality, the event to case ratio was 5:134 (3.73%) in the G-CSF group versus 6:129 (4.65%) in the non-G-CSF group, resulting in a relative risk of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.27–2.58; p = 0.54), which was not statistically significant. Only median values for hospitalization duration were available from the two RCTs, precluding a meta-analysis. For overall survival, quality of life, and pain, no suitable studies were found for analysis, rendering their assessment unfeasible. Conclusion: A weak recommendation is made that G-CSF treatment not be administered to patients with febrile neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy. G-CSF treatment can be considered for patients at high risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)700-705
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024 Jun

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Febrile neutropenia
  • G-CSF
  • Therapeutic use

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Hematology
  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Therapeutic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with febrile neutropenia: a comprehensive systematic review for clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022 from the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this