TY - JOUR
T1 - Total elbow arthroplasty using an augmented reality–assisted surgical technique
AU - Tanji, Atsushi
AU - Nagura, Takeo
AU - Iwamoto, Takuji
AU - Matsumura, Noboru
AU - Nakamura, Masaya
AU - Matsumoto, Morio
AU - Sato, Kazuki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Background: Precision placement of implants in total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) using conventional surgical techniques can be difficult and riddled with errors. Modern technologies such as augmented reality (AR) and 3-dimensional (3D) printing have already found useful applications in many fields of medicine. We proposed a cutting-edge surgical technique, augmented reality total elbow arthroplasty (ARTEA), that uses AR and 3D printing to provide 3D information for intuitive preoperative planning. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of humeral and ulnar component placement using ARTEA. Methods: Twelve upper extremities from human frozen cadavers were used for experiments performed in this study. We scanned the extremities via computed tomography prior to performing TEA to plan placement sites using computer simulations. The ARTEA technique was used to perform TEA surgery on 6 of the extremities, whereas conventional (non-ARTEA) techniques were used on the other 6 extremities. Computed tomography scanning was repeated after TEA completion, and the error between the planned and actual placements of humeral and ulnar components was calculated and compared. Results: For humeral component placement, the mean positional error ± standard deviation of ARTEA vs. non-ARTEA was 1.4° ± 0.6° vs. 4.4° ± 0.9° in total rotation (P = .002) and 1.5 ± 0.6 mm vs. 8.6 ± 1.3 mm in total translation (P = .002). For ulnar component placement, the mean positional error ± standard deviation of ARTEA vs. non-ARTEA was 5.5° ± 3.1° vs. 19.5° ± 9.8° in total rotation (P = .004) and 1.5 ± 0.4 mm vs. 6.9 ± 1.6 mm in total translation (P = .002). Both rotational accuracy and translational accuracy were greater for joint components replaced using the ARTEA technique compared with the non-ARTEA technique (P < .05). Conclusion: Compared with conventional surgical techniques, ARTEA had greater accuracy in prosthetic implant placement when used to perform TEA.
AB - Background: Precision placement of implants in total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) using conventional surgical techniques can be difficult and riddled with errors. Modern technologies such as augmented reality (AR) and 3-dimensional (3D) printing have already found useful applications in many fields of medicine. We proposed a cutting-edge surgical technique, augmented reality total elbow arthroplasty (ARTEA), that uses AR and 3D printing to provide 3D information for intuitive preoperative planning. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of humeral and ulnar component placement using ARTEA. Methods: Twelve upper extremities from human frozen cadavers were used for experiments performed in this study. We scanned the extremities via computed tomography prior to performing TEA to plan placement sites using computer simulations. The ARTEA technique was used to perform TEA surgery on 6 of the extremities, whereas conventional (non-ARTEA) techniques were used on the other 6 extremities. Computed tomography scanning was repeated after TEA completion, and the error between the planned and actual placements of humeral and ulnar components was calculated and compared. Results: For humeral component placement, the mean positional error ± standard deviation of ARTEA vs. non-ARTEA was 1.4° ± 0.6° vs. 4.4° ± 0.9° in total rotation (P = .002) and 1.5 ± 0.6 mm vs. 8.6 ± 1.3 mm in total translation (P = .002). For ulnar component placement, the mean positional error ± standard deviation of ARTEA vs. non-ARTEA was 5.5° ± 3.1° vs. 19.5° ± 9.8° in total rotation (P = .004) and 1.5 ± 0.4 mm vs. 6.9 ± 1.6 mm in total translation (P = .002). Both rotational accuracy and translational accuracy were greater for joint components replaced using the ARTEA technique compared with the non-ARTEA technique (P < .05). Conclusion: Compared with conventional surgical techniques, ARTEA had greater accuracy in prosthetic implant placement when used to perform TEA.
KW - 3-dimensional printing
KW - Basic Science Study
KW - Computer Modeling/Surgical Planning
KW - Total elbow arthroplasty
KW - accuracy analysis
KW - augmented reality
KW - computer simulation
KW - surgical system
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111706686&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111706686&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jse.2021.05.019
DO - 10.1016/j.jse.2021.05.019
M3 - Article
C2 - 34175467
AN - SCOPUS:85111706686
SN - 1058-2746
VL - 31
SP - 175
EP - 184
JO - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
JF - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
IS - 1
ER -