TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment preference for weekly versus daily DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
T2 - outcomes from the TRINITY trial
AU - Meguro, Shu
AU - Matsui, Shingo
AU - Itoh, Hiroshi
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge Dr Hisayoshi Daito, OCROM Clinic, Osaka, Japan, and Dr Osamu Matsuoka, ToCROM Clinic, Tokyo, Japan for their contribution in the conduct of this study. The authors would also like to acknowledge Professor Clare Bradley and Health Psychology Research Limited as the owners of the DTSQ questionnaire and to thank them for permitting its use in this trial. We acknowledge Hashem Dbouk and Sabah Farooq of FireKite, an Ashfield company, part of UDG Healthcare plc, for writing support during the development of this manuscript, which was funded by Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan), and complied with Good Publication Practice 3 ethical guidelines (Battisti et al., Ann Intern Med . 2015;163:461–464).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2019/12/2
Y1 - 2019/12/2
N2 - Objective: To examine patient preference for treatment with the oral once-weekly dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i), trelagliptin, and oral once-daily DPP-4i, alogliptin, administered for 8 weeks each in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus prescribed a daily DPP-4i. Methods: In this randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study, patients received trelagliptin followed by alogliptin (T-A group) or alogliptin followed by trelagliptin (A-T group), for 8 weeks each (NCT03231709, JapicCTI-173662). Treatment preference was assessed using a standardized questionnaire in the overall population and by baseline characteristics. Other outcomes included patient satisfaction with diabetes treatment (assessed using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire [DTSQ]), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels after 8 weeks of treatment with each agent, and safety. Results: Sixty patients from two clinical sites were randomized 1:1 to T-A and A-T groups (each n = 30); baseline characteristics were similar between groups. After 16 weeks of treatment, 51.7% of patients preferred treatment with alogliptin compared with 30.0% selecting trelagliptin (p =.014); preference for alogliptin was consistently greater than for trelagliptin in the secondary analyses by baseline characteristics. DTSQ score and HbA1c levels were similar between treatments after 8 weeks of therapy. Both treatments demonstrated favorable safety and tolerability profiles. Conclusions: Patients expressed a significantly greater treatment preference for once-daily alogliptin than once-weekly trelagliptin, although patient satisfaction and HbA1c levels were similar across treatments. The decision to administer a once-weekly or once-daily DPP-4i is likely to depend on patient preference, patient-physician discussions, and treatment practices of the prescribing physician.
AB - Objective: To examine patient preference for treatment with the oral once-weekly dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i), trelagliptin, and oral once-daily DPP-4i, alogliptin, administered for 8 weeks each in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus prescribed a daily DPP-4i. Methods: In this randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study, patients received trelagliptin followed by alogliptin (T-A group) or alogliptin followed by trelagliptin (A-T group), for 8 weeks each (NCT03231709, JapicCTI-173662). Treatment preference was assessed using a standardized questionnaire in the overall population and by baseline characteristics. Other outcomes included patient satisfaction with diabetes treatment (assessed using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire [DTSQ]), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels after 8 weeks of treatment with each agent, and safety. Results: Sixty patients from two clinical sites were randomized 1:1 to T-A and A-T groups (each n = 30); baseline characteristics were similar between groups. After 16 weeks of treatment, 51.7% of patients preferred treatment with alogliptin compared with 30.0% selecting trelagliptin (p =.014); preference for alogliptin was consistently greater than for trelagliptin in the secondary analyses by baseline characteristics. DTSQ score and HbA1c levels were similar between treatments after 8 weeks of therapy. Both treatments demonstrated favorable safety and tolerability profiles. Conclusions: Patients expressed a significantly greater treatment preference for once-daily alogliptin than once-weekly trelagliptin, although patient satisfaction and HbA1c levels were similar across treatments. The decision to administer a once-weekly or once-daily DPP-4i is likely to depend on patient preference, patient-physician discussions, and treatment practices of the prescribing physician.
KW - Alogliptin
KW - diabetes mellitus
KW - patient preference
KW - trelagliptin
KW - type 2
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071313644&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071313644&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03007995.2019.1651130
DO - 10.1080/03007995.2019.1651130
M3 - Article
C2 - 31366262
AN - SCOPUS:85071313644
SN - 0300-7995
VL - 35
SP - 2071
EP - 2078
JO - Current Medical Research and Opinion
JF - Current Medical Research and Opinion
IS - 12
ER -