TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding and Reviewing RDA Vocabularies in RDF
T2 - A Multi-Layer Framework Approach
AU - Taniguchi, Shoichi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©, Shoichi Taniguchi Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - This paper proposes a framework to understand and review the present and possible RDA Vocabularies in RDF after the 3 R Project, and also examines RDA Vocabularies under this framework to confirm the validity and usefulness of the framework. Further, it proposes an alternate for the vocabularies at each layer of the framework. (1) The proposed framework consists of four layers: (a) layer 1 constructs RDA Vocabularies in line with the RDA conceptual model; (b) layer 2 constructs vocabularies in RDF representation that accommodate the recording methods prescribed in RDA for individual elements; (c) layer 3 constructs them by reconstructing the relationship elements; and (d) layer 4 accommodates additional ways to enforce the structural representation of RDA metadata. RDA Vocabularies are examined at each layer to demonstrate the framework’s validity and usefulness. (2) Alternate vocabularies in RDF are proposed at layers 2 and 3 of the framework. Those proposed vocabularies could be useful, but the examination of their usefulness is limited. Extensions at layer 4 would also be useful for the schema for RDA metadata creation. Therefore, the proposed framework is valuable for understanding and reviewing RDA Vocabularies, while some points need further consideration.
AB - This paper proposes a framework to understand and review the present and possible RDA Vocabularies in RDF after the 3 R Project, and also examines RDA Vocabularies under this framework to confirm the validity and usefulness of the framework. Further, it proposes an alternate for the vocabularies at each layer of the framework. (1) The proposed framework consists of four layers: (a) layer 1 constructs RDA Vocabularies in line with the RDA conceptual model; (b) layer 2 constructs vocabularies in RDF representation that accommodate the recording methods prescribed in RDA for individual elements; (c) layer 3 constructs them by reconstructing the relationship elements; and (d) layer 4 accommodates additional ways to enforce the structural representation of RDA metadata. RDA Vocabularies are examined at each layer to demonstrate the framework’s validity and usefulness. (2) Alternate vocabularies in RDF are proposed at layers 2 and 3 of the framework. Those proposed vocabularies could be useful, but the examination of their usefulness is limited. Extensions at layer 4 would also be useful for the schema for RDA metadata creation. Therefore, the proposed framework is valuable for understanding and reviewing RDA Vocabularies, while some points need further consideration.
KW - linked data
KW - RDA vocabularies
KW - RDF
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110762781&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85110762781&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/19386389.2021.1941717
DO - 10.1080/19386389.2021.1941717
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85110762781
SN - 1938-6389
VL - 20
SP - 237
EP - 260
JO - Journal of Library Metadata
JF - Journal of Library Metadata
IS - 4
ER -