TY - JOUR
T1 - Unmet Needs in Managing Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Malignancy
AU - Inohara, Taku
AU - Endo, Ayaka
AU - Melloni, Chiara
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflict of Interest Statement: TI discloses the following relationships—Research Grant: JSPS Overseas Research fellowship and Boston Scientific. CM’s disclosure can be viewed in the Supplementary Data Sheet 1.
Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2019 Inohara, Endo and Melloni.
PY - 2019/5/17
Y1 - 2019/5/17
N2 - Patients with cancer face a high short-term risk of arterial thromboembolism. One of the most fatal manifestations of arterial thromboembolism is myocardial infarction (MI), and patients with cancer face a 3-fold greater risk of MI than patients without cancer. The individual risk for arterial thrombotic events in patients with cancer is determined by the complex interaction of baseline cardiovascular risk factors, cancer type and stage, chemotherapeutic regimen, and other general contributing factors for thrombosis. Managing MI in patients with cancer is a clinical challenge, particularly due to cancer's unique pathophysiology, which makes it difficult to balance thrombotic and bleeding risks in this specific patient population. When patients with cancer present with MI, a limited proportion are treated with guideline-recommended therapy, such as antiplatelet therapy or invasive revascularization. Despite the limited evidence, existing reports consistently suggest similar clinical benefits of guideline-recommended therapy when administered to patients with cancer presenting with MI. In this review, we briefly summarize the available evidence, clinical challenges, and future perspectives on simultaneous management of MI and cancer, with a focus on invasive strategy.
AB - Patients with cancer face a high short-term risk of arterial thromboembolism. One of the most fatal manifestations of arterial thromboembolism is myocardial infarction (MI), and patients with cancer face a 3-fold greater risk of MI than patients without cancer. The individual risk for arterial thrombotic events in patients with cancer is determined by the complex interaction of baseline cardiovascular risk factors, cancer type and stage, chemotherapeutic regimen, and other general contributing factors for thrombosis. Managing MI in patients with cancer is a clinical challenge, particularly due to cancer's unique pathophysiology, which makes it difficult to balance thrombotic and bleeding risks in this specific patient population. When patients with cancer present with MI, a limited proportion are treated with guideline-recommended therapy, such as antiplatelet therapy or invasive revascularization. Despite the limited evidence, existing reports consistently suggest similar clinical benefits of guideline-recommended therapy when administered to patients with cancer presenting with MI. In this review, we briefly summarize the available evidence, clinical challenges, and future perspectives on simultaneous management of MI and cancer, with a focus on invasive strategy.
KW - arterial thrombosis
KW - cancer
KW - chemotherapy
KW - invasive strategy
KW - myocardial infarction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077205995&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077205995&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00057
DO - 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00057
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85077205995
SN - 2297-055X
VL - 6
JO - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
JF - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
M1 - 57
ER -