What are the economic health costs of non-action in controlling toxic water pollution?

K. William Easter, Yoshifumi Konishi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)


This paper identifies information that may be important in determining the benefits of preventing toxic water contamination (or equivalent cost of non-action) when a given toxification occurs. It attempts to identify information and behaviour issues that need to be considered when benefits are estimated and weighed against the costs of removing toxins. This paper also provides 'scenarios' for three toxic pollutants that are found in water bodies. The paper makes use of two alternatives, one for developing countries and the other for developed countries, to demonstrate, with specific examples of arsenic, mercury and atrazine, how benefit estimates and control policies vary with different assumptions concerning behaviour/information and type of chemical contamination.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)529-541
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Water Resources Development
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Dec
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Water Science and Technology


Dive into the research topics of 'What are the economic health costs of non-action in controlling toxic water pollution?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this