Wide-Angle Viewing System versus Conventional Indirect Ophthalmoscopy for Scleral Buckling

Yohei Tomita, Toshihide Kurihara, Atsuro Uchida, Norihiro Nagai, Hajime Shinoda, Kazuo Tsubota, Yoko Ozawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)


Wide-angle viewing systems (WAVSs) were originally established for pars plana vitrectomy. However, their application to scleral buckling surgery was recently reported. In this study, we compared the outcomes of scleral buckling using a noncontact WAVS with that of scleral buckling using conventional indirect ophthalmoscopy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. The clinical records of 39 eyes (39 patients) with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment primarily treated between November 2012 and June 2014 at the Vitreo-Retina Surgical Division Clinic at the Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Scleral bucking was performed using WAVS with surgical placement of an endoilluminator in 16 eyes and indirect ophthalmoscopy in 23 eyes. The patients in these groups were consecutive over different intervals. The preoperative demographics, success rate of retinal reattachment, intraoperative findings, and postoperative complications were evaluated. There were no significant differences in pre- or postoperative conditions between groups, and similar surgical outcomes were achieved with the WAVS and conventional procedures. However, compared with the conventional procedure, the WAVS procedure resulted in fewer intraoperative corneal epithelial disorders (p = 0.049) and decreased the surgical duration of segmental buckling (p = 0.02); therefore, it may be suggested as an effective alternative procedure.

Original languageEnglish
Article number13256
JournalScientific reports
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Sept 2

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General


Dive into the research topics of 'Wide-Angle Viewing System versus Conventional Indirect Ophthalmoscopy for Scleral Buckling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this