TY - JOUR
T1 - 血管型Ehlers-Danlos 症候群患者の下部消化管穿孔に対して保存的加療が 奏効した1 例
AU - Mizuno, Shodai
AU - Seishima, Ryo
AU - Okabayashi, Koji
AU - Tsuruta, Masashi
AU - Shigeta, Kohei
AU - Kitagawa, Yuko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - A 24-year-old woman visited the emergency room at our hospital with a complaint of left abdominal pain. She had a history of bilateral internal carotid artery dissection and bilateral vertebral artery dissection and had been diagnosed with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) 8 months before. Abdominal CT at the time of her visit revealed intramural emphysema and free air at the splenic curve of the colon, which suggested colonic perforation. Given that abdominal pain was localized, making it unlikely to be due to peritonitis, and that there are high risks associated with surgery in patients with vascular EDS, we chose conservative treatment. After admission, the inflammatory reaction and abdominal symptom improved steadily, and she was discharged on the 29th hospital day. Although surgery is a basic treatment strategy for colonic perforation, a careful decision is required since delayed wound healing often causes serious postoperative complications. This case suggests that conservative treatment can be an option if symptoms are mild and the general condition is relatively good in patients who have been diagnosed with vascular EDS.
AB - A 24-year-old woman visited the emergency room at our hospital with a complaint of left abdominal pain. She had a history of bilateral internal carotid artery dissection and bilateral vertebral artery dissection and had been diagnosed with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) 8 months before. Abdominal CT at the time of her visit revealed intramural emphysema and free air at the splenic curve of the colon, which suggested colonic perforation. Given that abdominal pain was localized, making it unlikely to be due to peritonitis, and that there are high risks associated with surgery in patients with vascular EDS, we chose conservative treatment. After admission, the inflammatory reaction and abdominal symptom improved steadily, and she was discharged on the 29th hospital day. Although surgery is a basic treatment strategy for colonic perforation, a careful decision is required since delayed wound healing often causes serious postoperative complications. This case suggests that conservative treatment can be an option if symptoms are mild and the general condition is relatively good in patients who have been diagnosed with vascular EDS.
KW - colonic perforation
KW - conservative treatment
KW - vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114768213&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85114768213&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5833/jjgs.2020.0103
DO - 10.5833/jjgs.2020.0103
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85114768213
SN - 0386-9768
VL - 54
SP - 556
EP - 562
JO - Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery
JF - Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery
IS - 8
ER -