TY - JOUR
T1 - Antipsychotic nonadherence measured by electronic adherence monitoring in stabilized chronic schizophrenia
T2 - Clinical implications
AU - Takeuchi, Hiroyoshi
AU - Sanches, Marcos
AU - Borlido, Carol
AU - Agid, Ofer
AU - Remington, Gary
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR, 201011 , Pfizer Operating Grant in Disease Prevention and Management), awarded to Dr. G. Remington.
Funding Information:
Dr. Remington has received research support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), University of Toronto, HLS Therapeutics, and Research Hospital Fund – Canada Foundation for Innovation (RHF-CFI); advisory board support from HLS Therapeutics; and consultant fees from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Background: There have been a number of studies investigating antipsychotic adherence measured by electronic adherence monitoring (EAM) in patients with schizophrenia. However, no study has looked at overall adherence and both baseline and endpoint illness/symptom severity. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of our previous study to examine antipsychotic adherence, as measured by EAM, and illness/symptom severity at baseline and endpoint in patients with schizophrenia. Adherence rates were defined as the proportion of adherent days over 3 months. Adherent days were defined as the subject having taken the medication at the prescribed time, with 2 tolerance margins operationally defined i.e., ±3 h and ±12 h. In addition, a dichotomous version of adherence was defined i.e., if he/she was adherent greater than 80% of the days. Illness severity and symptom severity were assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total score and the Clinical Global Impression – Severity of illness (CGI-S) scale score, respectively. Results: A total of 111 patients were enrolled in the study. Neither continuous or dichotomous adherence rates were significantly associated with baseline or endpoint illness/symptom severity (all Ps ≥ 0.05). The results remained unchanged when adjusting for clinico-demographic characteristics. Conclusion: Antipsychotic adherence, as measured by EAM, was not associated with illness/symptom severity at baseline and endpoint in patients with chronic schizophrenia, whose clinical status and adherence pattern were stabilized. This suggests that individuals may be able to achieve clinical stability in the face of maintenance antipsychotic treatment despite variations in adherence.
AB - Background: There have been a number of studies investigating antipsychotic adherence measured by electronic adherence monitoring (EAM) in patients with schizophrenia. However, no study has looked at overall adherence and both baseline and endpoint illness/symptom severity. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of our previous study to examine antipsychotic adherence, as measured by EAM, and illness/symptom severity at baseline and endpoint in patients with schizophrenia. Adherence rates were defined as the proportion of adherent days over 3 months. Adherent days were defined as the subject having taken the medication at the prescribed time, with 2 tolerance margins operationally defined i.e., ±3 h and ±12 h. In addition, a dichotomous version of adherence was defined i.e., if he/she was adherent greater than 80% of the days. Illness severity and symptom severity were assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total score and the Clinical Global Impression – Severity of illness (CGI-S) scale score, respectively. Results: A total of 111 patients were enrolled in the study. Neither continuous or dichotomous adherence rates were significantly associated with baseline or endpoint illness/symptom severity (all Ps ≥ 0.05). The results remained unchanged when adjusting for clinico-demographic characteristics. Conclusion: Antipsychotic adherence, as measured by EAM, was not associated with illness/symptom severity at baseline and endpoint in patients with chronic schizophrenia, whose clinical status and adherence pattern were stabilized. This suggests that individuals may be able to achieve clinical stability in the face of maintenance antipsychotic treatment despite variations in adherence.
KW - Adherence
KW - Antipsychotics
KW - Compliance
KW - Outcomes
KW - Schizophrenia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115377656&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85115377656&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.schres.2021.08.017
DO - 10.1016/j.schres.2021.08.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 34563881
AN - SCOPUS:85115377656
SN - 0920-9964
VL - 237
SP - 202
EP - 207
JO - Schizophrenia Research
JF - Schizophrenia Research
ER -