TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenges of Data Availability and Use in Conducting Health-EDRM Research in a Post-COVID-19 World
AU - Chan, Emily Ying Yang
AU - Guha-Sapir, Debarati
AU - Dubois, Caroline
AU - Shaw, Rajib
AU - Wong, Chi Sing
N1 - Funding Information:
In another population-based study investigating the impact of service suspension on families with members requiring long-term care, results showed that 25.1% of respondents engaged in regular home care responsibilities, including care of people with disabilities. Among these, 20% reported previously using community services for such care. This added burden of care comes at an economic and social cost to individuals who must take time off work or adjust their habitual schedules to provide care [10]. This research from Hong Kong became the basis for a cross-organisational, multi-disciplinary commentary piece on knowledge gaps for home care, supported by experts from Geneva, the United Kingdom, and the United States [11]. The research evolved into a global-level guideline published by the World Health Organization on the importance of supporting home care during lockdown, and the need to recognise the burden of home care provision. These guidelines aimed to strengthen community health capacities and emergency response worldwide [12].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2022/4/1
Y1 - 2022/4/1
N2 - Disasters disrupt communication channels, infrastructure, and overburden health systems. This creates unique challenges to the functionality of surveillance tools, data collection systems, and information sharing platforms. The WHO Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management (Health-EDRM) framework highlights the need for appropriate data collection, data interpretation, and data use from individual, community, and global levels. The COVID-19 crisis has evolved the way hazards and risks are viewed. No longer as a linear event but as a protracted hazard, with cascading and compound risks that affect communities facing complex risks such as climate-related disasters or urban growth. The large-scale disruptions of COVID-19 show that disaster data must evolve beyond mortality and frequency of events, in order to encompass the impact on the livelihood of communities, differentiated between population groups. This includes relative economic losses and psychosocial damage. COVID-19 has created a global opportunity to review how the scientific community classifies data, and how comparable indicators are selected to inform evidence-based resilience building and emergency preparedness. A shift into microlevel data, and regional-level information sharing is necessary to tailor community-level interventions for risk mitigation and disaster preparedness. Real-time data sharing, open governance, cross-organisational, and interplatform collaboration are necessary not just in Health-EDRM and control of biological hazards, but for all natural hazards and man-made disasters.
AB - Disasters disrupt communication channels, infrastructure, and overburden health systems. This creates unique challenges to the functionality of surveillance tools, data collection systems, and information sharing platforms. The WHO Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management (Health-EDRM) framework highlights the need for appropriate data collection, data interpretation, and data use from individual, community, and global levels. The COVID-19 crisis has evolved the way hazards and risks are viewed. No longer as a linear event but as a protracted hazard, with cascading and compound risks that affect communities facing complex risks such as climate-related disasters or urban growth. The large-scale disruptions of COVID-19 show that disaster data must evolve beyond mortality and frequency of events, in order to encompass the impact on the livelihood of communities, differentiated between population groups. This includes relative economic losses and psychosocial damage. COVID-19 has created a global opportunity to review how the scientific community classifies data, and how comparable indicators are selected to inform evidence-based resilience building and emergency preparedness. A shift into microlevel data, and regional-level information sharing is necessary to tailor community-level interventions for risk mitigation and disaster preparedness. Real-time data sharing, open governance, cross-organisational, and interplatform collaboration are necessary not just in Health-EDRM and control of biological hazards, but for all natural hazards and man-made disasters.
KW - Biological hazards
KW - COVID-19
KW - Data availability
KW - Data management
KW - Data use
KW - Disasters
KW - Health-EDRM
KW - Natural disasters
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126853090&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126853090&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph19073917
DO - 10.3390/ijerph19073917
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 35409599
AN - SCOPUS:85126853090
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 19
JO - International journal of environmental research and public health
JF - International journal of environmental research and public health
IS - 7
M1 - 3917
ER -