TY - JOUR
T1 - CITRUS, cervical cancer screening trial by randomization of HPV testing intervention for upcoming screening
T2 - Design, methods and baseline data of 18,471 women
AU - Morisada, Tohru
AU - Teramoto, Katsuhiro
AU - Takano, Hirokuni
AU - Sakamoto, Ikuko
AU - Nishio, Hiroshi
AU - Iwata, Takashi
AU - Hashi, Akihiko
AU - Katoh, Ryohei
AU - Okamoto, Aikou
AU - Sasaki, Hiroshi
AU - Nakatani, Eiji
AU - Teramukai, Satoshi
AU - Aoki, Daisuke
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr Iwata declares receipt of research funding from Roche and Sekisui Medical (Inst). Dr Aoki has received honoraria from Roche and Hologic, and undertakes a Consulting or Advisory Role for Sysmex and Sekisui Medical (Inst); all other authors (TM, KT, HT, IS, HN, AH, RK, AO, HS, EN, ST) have no COI to disclose.
Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Japanese Society of Clinical Cytology (JSCC) . As an investigator-initiated clinical study, the principal investigator, Prof. Daisuke Aoki, Keio University School of Medicine, was responsible for conducting the study, with operational and technical support provided by the JSCC and the Foundation for Biomedical Research & Innovation under contract with the JSCC. It should be noted that the JSCC is a public interest incorporated foundation, committed to the promotion of clinical research related to cytology, receiving financial resources from the Japanese government as well as medical device companies, including Hologic Japan, Inc. None of these companies played a role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the report.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/10
Y1 - 2017/10
N2 - Background To assess the efficacy of screening with concurrent liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for primary cervical cancer screening, we initiated a randomized trial entitled CervIcal cancer screening Trial by Randomization of HPV testing intervention for Upcoming Screening (CITRUS). Methods Between June 2013 and March 2015, women aged 30–64 years of age who participated in a regular cervical cancer screening program (every 2 years) were invited to enrollment of our study. After giving their informed consent, 18,402 women were randomly assigned to liquid-based cytology as the control group (n = 9145) or to HPV DNA testing with liquid-based cytology as the intervention group (n = 9257). We subsequently compared the incidence rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), the rate of false positive tests and the rate of overdiagnosis, as well as assessing the risks and benefits of receiving screening for women in both groups. The primary outcome of our study was the incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) during the study period of around 6 years. Results In the control group, 97.9% of women were NILM, and 2.06% ASC-US or worse (ASC-US+). In the intervention group, 87.13% of women were NILM/HPV negative, 0.72% ASC-US/HPV negative, 10.34% NILM/HPV positive, 0.69% ASC-US/HPV positive, 0.90% worse than ASC-US/either HPV. Positive HPV testing was not linearly related to age in our study. Conclusions Insights from CITRUS will provide future prospects for cervical cancer screening focused on the use of HPV testing in Japan. Clinical trial registration number: NCT01895517, UMIN000010843, TRIUC1312.
AB - Background To assess the efficacy of screening with concurrent liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for primary cervical cancer screening, we initiated a randomized trial entitled CervIcal cancer screening Trial by Randomization of HPV testing intervention for Upcoming Screening (CITRUS). Methods Between June 2013 and March 2015, women aged 30–64 years of age who participated in a regular cervical cancer screening program (every 2 years) were invited to enrollment of our study. After giving their informed consent, 18,402 women were randomly assigned to liquid-based cytology as the control group (n = 9145) or to HPV DNA testing with liquid-based cytology as the intervention group (n = 9257). We subsequently compared the incidence rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), the rate of false positive tests and the rate of overdiagnosis, as well as assessing the risks and benefits of receiving screening for women in both groups. The primary outcome of our study was the incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) during the study period of around 6 years. Results In the control group, 97.9% of women were NILM, and 2.06% ASC-US or worse (ASC-US+). In the intervention group, 87.13% of women were NILM/HPV negative, 0.72% ASC-US/HPV negative, 10.34% NILM/HPV positive, 0.69% ASC-US/HPV positive, 0.90% worse than ASC-US/either HPV. Positive HPV testing was not linearly related to age in our study. Conclusions Insights from CITRUS will provide future prospects for cervical cancer screening focused on the use of HPV testing in Japan. Clinical trial registration number: NCT01895517, UMIN000010843, TRIUC1312.
KW - Cervical cancer
KW - Cytology
KW - Human papillomavirus DNA test
KW - Mass screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029502605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029502605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.canep.2017.07.017
DO - 10.1016/j.canep.2017.07.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 28818742
AN - SCOPUS:85029502605
SN - 1877-7821
VL - 50
SP - 60
EP - 67
JO - Cancer Epidemiology
JF - Cancer Epidemiology
ER -