TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing the minimum income standard in the UK and Japan
T2 - Methodology and outcome
AU - Davis, Abigail
AU - Hirsch, Donald
AU - Iwanaga, Rie
AU - Iwata, Masami
AU - Shigekawa, Junko
AU - Uzuki, Yuka
AU - Yamada, Atsuhiro
PY - 2014/1
Y1 - 2014/1
N2 - Minimum Income Standard (MIS) research involves an innovative methodology that combines consensual decisions made through discussion by members of the public, supported by input from experts. MIS addresses questions about income adequacy, and in particular, what is the income that people need in order to reach a minimum socially acceptable standard of living. The first MIS for Britain was published in the UK in 2008, and in 2010 researchers from Japan and the UK began to collaborate on developing a comparable Minimum Income Standard for Japan. This article discusses the differences and similarities between the UK and Japanese MIS. It looks at the challenges of applying the methodology in a very different setting and compares the results of the research in the UK and in Japan. Although there are notable differences in the lists of goods and services that comprise the budgets, there are also some striking similarities. This research suggests that the MIS methodology offers an approach that can be used in different countries to inform discussions on contemporary living standards and societal norms, and to enable international comparisons to be drawn.
AB - Minimum Income Standard (MIS) research involves an innovative methodology that combines consensual decisions made through discussion by members of the public, supported by input from experts. MIS addresses questions about income adequacy, and in particular, what is the income that people need in order to reach a minimum socially acceptable standard of living. The first MIS for Britain was published in the UK in 2008, and in 2010 researchers from Japan and the UK began to collaborate on developing a comparable Minimum Income Standard for Japan. This article discusses the differences and similarities between the UK and Japanese MIS. It looks at the challenges of applying the methodology in a very different setting and compares the results of the research in the UK and in Japan. Although there are notable differences in the lists of goods and services that comprise the budgets, there are also some striking similarities. This research suggests that the MIS methodology offers an approach that can be used in different countries to inform discussions on contemporary living standards and societal norms, and to enable international comparisons to be drawn.
KW - Japan
KW - Minimum income standards
KW - UK
KW - budget standards
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893031969&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893031969&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S147474641300033X
DO - 10.1017/S147474641300033X
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84893031969
SN - 1474-7464
VL - 13
SP - 89
EP - 101
JO - Social Policy and Society
JF - Social Policy and Society
IS - 1
ER -