抄録
2 control strategies were compared: The pulse frequency control and the pulse width control. The model used in this study is a combination of 2 models Riener et al. proposed: force output model and knee angle output model. Because there were no specific details about the pulse generator, we made a model that can fire pulse with different rates. We used NN as a feed forward and Gain Scheduling PID as feedback controller for control strategy. For comparison, a proposed fatigue cost function and tracking error function were used. As a result frequency control suppressed the fatigue more but the pulse width control had better tracking performance.
| 本文言語 | English |
|---|---|
| ページ | 1393-1397 |
| ページ数 | 5 |
| 出版ステータス | Published - 2013 1月 1 |
| イベント | 2013 52nd Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan, SICE 2013 - Nagoya, Japan 継続期間: 2013 9月 14 → 2013 9月 17 |
Other
| Other | 2013 52nd Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan, SICE 2013 |
|---|---|
| 国/地域 | Japan |
| City | Nagoya |
| Period | 13/9/14 → 13/9/17 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- 制御およびシステム工学
- コンピュータ サイエンスの応用
- 電子工学および電気工学