TY - JOUR
T1 - Current status of shared decision making for rheumatoid arthritis treatment in Japan
T2 - a web-based survey on physicians and patients
AU - Tsuboi, Hiroto
AU - Kaneko, Yuko
AU - Ikeda, Kei
AU - Aranishi, Toshihiko
AU - Cai, Zhihong
AU - Ishizuka, Tomoko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Eli Lilly Japan K.K. Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Objective: To assess the current status of shared decision making (SDM) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical practice in Japan from the perspectives of physicians and patients. Methods: A web-based survey was conducted to recruit patients with RA who were prescribed, for the first time, a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) or a biological drug/Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, and physicians who prescribed these treatments to patients with RA. The SDM Questionnaire-Physician version (SDM-Q-Doc) and the 9-item SDM Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) were used to assess the SDM levels of physicians and patients, respectively. The scale ranged from 0 to 100, and higher scores indicated better SDM status. Results: The responses from 107 physicians who treat patients with RA, 107 patients prescribed a csDMARD, and 110 patients prescribed a biological drug/JAK inhibitor were collected. The mean SDM score for SDM-Q-Doc was 74.5 when physicians decided to prescribe a csDMARD and 77.2 when they decided to prescribe a biological drug/JAK inhibitor. However, the mean SDM score for SDM-Q-9 was 62.3 when patients were prescribed csDMARDs and 72.6 when they were prescribed biological drugs/JAK inhibitors. Conclusions: The results showed differences in SDM level between patients and physicians and, from the patient perspective, between treatment types.
AB - Objective: To assess the current status of shared decision making (SDM) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical practice in Japan from the perspectives of physicians and patients. Methods: A web-based survey was conducted to recruit patients with RA who were prescribed, for the first time, a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) or a biological drug/Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, and physicians who prescribed these treatments to patients with RA. The SDM Questionnaire-Physician version (SDM-Q-Doc) and the 9-item SDM Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) were used to assess the SDM levels of physicians and patients, respectively. The scale ranged from 0 to 100, and higher scores indicated better SDM status. Results: The responses from 107 physicians who treat patients with RA, 107 patients prescribed a csDMARD, and 110 patients prescribed a biological drug/JAK inhibitor were collected. The mean SDM score for SDM-Q-Doc was 74.5 when physicians decided to prescribe a csDMARD and 77.2 when they decided to prescribe a biological drug/JAK inhibitor. However, the mean SDM score for SDM-Q-9 was 62.3 when patients were prescribed csDMARDs and 72.6 when they were prescribed biological drugs/JAK inhibitors. Conclusions: The results showed differences in SDM level between patients and physicians and, from the patient perspective, between treatment types.
KW - Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor
KW - Rheumatoid arthritis
KW - SDM-Q-9
KW - biological drugs
KW - shared decision making
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85127214172
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85127214172#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1080/03007995.2022.2050108
DO - 10.1080/03007995.2022.2050108
M3 - Article
C2 - 35260022
AN - SCOPUS:85127214172
SN - 0300-7995
VL - 38
SP - 853
EP - 861
JO - Current Medical Research and Opinion
JF - Current Medical Research and Opinion
IS - 5
ER -