TY - JOUR
T1 - Definitive Tumor Resection after Myeloablative High Dose Chemotherapy Is a Feasible and Effective Option in the Multimodal Treatment of High-Risk Neuroblastoma
T2 - A Single Institution Experience
AU - Hishiki, Tomoro
AU - Fujino, Akihiro
AU - Watanabe, Toshihiko
AU - Tahara, Kazunori
AU - Ohno, Michinobu
AU - Yamada, Yohei
AU - Tomonaga, Kotaro
AU - Kutsukake, Mai
AU - Fujita, Takuro
AU - Kawakubo, Naonori
AU - Matsumoto, Kimikazu
AU - Kiyotani, Chikako
AU - Shioda, Yoko
AU - Miyazaki, Osamu
AU - Fuji, Hiroshi
AU - Yoshioka, Takako
AU - Kanamori, Yutaka
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by the JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (No. 17H01592 ) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, and Science of Japan. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with respect to this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - Background/Purpose: The delayed local treatment approach (DL) in high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB) refers to the process in which tumor resection is performed after the completion of all the courses of chemotherapy, including myeloablative high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). Alternatively, in the conventional local treatment approach (CL), tumor resection is performed during induction chemotherapy. In this study, we compared the surgical outcomes in HR-NB patients treated by CL and DL. Method: Forty-seven patients with abdominal HR-NB underwent primary tumor resection from 2002 to 2018. The timing of surgery was generally determined by following the trials and guidelines available at the time. The outcomes and surgical complications between the two strategies were compared. Result: Operation time, blood loss, and postoperative WBC counts were lower in the DL group (n = 25) when compared to the CL group (n = 22), statistical significance notwithstanding. Major vascular structures were less frequently encased in the DL group tumors, while immediate surgical complications were significantly more frequent in the CL group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the 3-year EFSs were 50.0% and 53.9% in the DL and CL groups, respectively. Conclusion: DL appears to be a feasible and effective treatment option for HR-NB. Nonetheless, further verifications using larger cohorts are warranted. Level of evidence: Treatment study, Level III.
AB - Background/Purpose: The delayed local treatment approach (DL) in high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB) refers to the process in which tumor resection is performed after the completion of all the courses of chemotherapy, including myeloablative high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). Alternatively, in the conventional local treatment approach (CL), tumor resection is performed during induction chemotherapy. In this study, we compared the surgical outcomes in HR-NB patients treated by CL and DL. Method: Forty-seven patients with abdominal HR-NB underwent primary tumor resection from 2002 to 2018. The timing of surgery was generally determined by following the trials and guidelines available at the time. The outcomes and surgical complications between the two strategies were compared. Result: Operation time, blood loss, and postoperative WBC counts were lower in the DL group (n = 25) when compared to the CL group (n = 22), statistical significance notwithstanding. Major vascular structures were less frequently encased in the DL group tumors, while immediate surgical complications were significantly more frequent in the CL group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the 3-year EFSs were 50.0% and 53.9% in the DL and CL groups, respectively. Conclusion: DL appears to be a feasible and effective treatment option for HR-NB. Nonetheless, further verifications using larger cohorts are warranted. Level of evidence: Treatment study, Level III.
KW - Complication
KW - Delayed local treatment
KW - Neuroblastoma
KW - Resectability
KW - Surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072705283&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072705283&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.08.050
DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.08.050
M3 - Article
C2 - 31575417
AN - SCOPUS:85072705283
SN - 0022-3468
VL - 55
SP - 1655
EP - 1659
JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery
JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery
IS - 8
ER -