TY - JOUR
T1 - Difference by instructional set in stabilometry
AU - Nishiwaki, Yuji
AU - Takebayashi, Toru
AU - Imai, Azusa
AU - Yamamoto, Masahiko
AU - Omae, Kazuyuki
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - There is no standard for the awareness of standing posture in stabilometry, yet little research addressing the matter has been carried out. In the present study, we evaluated the influence of different instructional sets during, a test on stabilometry. Stabilometry was performed on 349 male subjects. Two different instructions were prepared for the subjects regarding the awareness of their standing posture. These instructions were a) 'Please relax when you stand' (R-standing), and b) 'Please make an effort to minimize your body sway' (E-standing). Subjects were classified into four groups according to the combination of these instructions they received. For the five body sway parameters, a comparison between R-standing and E-standing was performed, controlling for possible confounders such as age, height, body weight, educational history, alcohol consumption, and smoking status. The sway length in E-standing was larger than that in R-standing, even after the adjustment for possible confounders. Our results indicate that the difference in the instructional set caused a significant measurement bias. Thorough-going unification of instructions for the stabilometry should be recommended when stabilometry is performed in an epidemiological investigation.
AB - There is no standard for the awareness of standing posture in stabilometry, yet little research addressing the matter has been carried out. In the present study, we evaluated the influence of different instructional sets during, a test on stabilometry. Stabilometry was performed on 349 male subjects. Two different instructions were prepared for the subjects regarding the awareness of their standing posture. These instructions were a) 'Please relax when you stand' (R-standing), and b) 'Please make an effort to minimize your body sway' (E-standing). Subjects were classified into four groups according to the combination of these instructions they received. For the five body sway parameters, a comparison between R-standing and E-standing was performed, controlling for possible confounders such as age, height, body weight, educational history, alcohol consumption, and smoking status. The sway length in E-standing was larger than that in R-standing, even after the adjustment for possible confounders. Our results indicate that the difference in the instructional set caused a significant measurement bias. Thorough-going unification of instructions for the stabilometry should be recommended when stabilometry is performed in an epidemiological investigation.
KW - Body sway
KW - Epidemiological investigation
KW - Measurement bias
KW - Stabilometry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033818092&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033818092&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 11052154
AN - SCOPUS:0033818092
SN - 0957-4271
VL - 10
SP - 157
EP - 161
JO - Journal of Vestibular Research: Equilibrium and Orientation
JF - Journal of Vestibular Research: Equilibrium and Orientation
IS - 3
ER -