TY - CONF
T1 - Direct numerical simulation of spatially developing turbulent boundary layer for skin friction drag reduction by wall surface-heating or cooling
AU - Kametani, Yukinori
AU - Fukagata, Koji
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2011 International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena TSFP. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Direct numerical simulation (DNS) of spatially developing turbulent boundary layer with uniform heating or cooling is performed aiming at skin friction drag reduction. The Reynolds number based on the free-stream velocity, the 99% boundary layer thickness at the inlet and the kinematic viscosity is set to be 3000 and the Prandtl number is 0.71. A constant temperature is imposed on the wall. The Richardson number for the buoyancy Ri is varied in the range of −0.02 ≤ Ri ≤ 0.02. The DNS results show that uniform cooling (UC) reduces the skin friction drag, while uniform heating (UH) enhances it. The trend is similar to that in channel flow s tudied by Iida & Kasagi (1997) and Iida et al. (2002). An analysis using the FIK identity clarifies that UC can reduce skin friction drag by stabilizing the turbulent in the flow, while UH has the opposite trends; UC generates stable density stratification and UH does unstable one.
AB - Direct numerical simulation (DNS) of spatially developing turbulent boundary layer with uniform heating or cooling is performed aiming at skin friction drag reduction. The Reynolds number based on the free-stream velocity, the 99% boundary layer thickness at the inlet and the kinematic viscosity is set to be 3000 and the Prandtl number is 0.71. A constant temperature is imposed on the wall. The Richardson number for the buoyancy Ri is varied in the range of −0.02 ≤ Ri ≤ 0.02. The DNS results show that uniform cooling (UC) reduces the skin friction drag, while uniform heating (UH) enhances it. The trend is similar to that in channel flow s tudied by Iida & Kasagi (1997) and Iida et al. (2002). An analysis using the FIK identity clarifies that UC can reduce skin friction drag by stabilizing the turbulent in the flow, while UH has the opposite trends; UC generates stable density stratification and UH does unstable one.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048664815&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048664815&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14685248.2012.710750
DO - 10.1080/14685248.2012.710750
M3 - Paper
AN - SCOPUS:85048664815
T2 - 7th International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, TSFP 2011
Y2 - 28 July 2011 through 31 July 2011
ER -