TY - JOUR
T1 - Diverting stomas
T2 - Comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy
AU - Kabeshima, Yasuo
AU - Watanabe, Masahiko
AU - Hasegawa, Hirotoshi
AU - Yamamoto, Seiichiro
AU - Endo, Takashi
AU - Yamauchi, Takeyoshi
AU - Yorozuya, Kyoko
AU - Sauchi, Yumikko
AU - Kitajima, Masaki
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Introduction: Transverse loop colostomy is conventionally used to defunction the distal colon and rectum following certain surgical procedures. Loop ileostomy has recently become more widespread among colorectal surgeons. We compared these 2 procedures when used to defunction the distal colon and rectum. Methods: Subject were 43 patients undergoing closure of a diverting stoma between 1995 and 2000. They were divided into an ileostomy group (n=25; IS group) and a transverse colostomy group (n=18; CS group). Median follow-up was 41 months. Results: Age, gender and indication for surgery were similar in both groups. Between stoma construction and closure, no significant differences were observed except in the method of anastomosis. After stoma closure, significant differences were observed in the incidence of bowel obstruction (IS: 4.0%, CS: 33.3%; P=0.031) and length of postoperative hospital stay (IS: 7.6±2.5days, CS: 10.6±5.0 days; P=0.017). No difference was seen in other complications. Conclusion: These results indicate that the loop ileostomy may be the procedure of choice when a diverting stoma is needed to defunction the distal colon and rectum.
AB - Introduction: Transverse loop colostomy is conventionally used to defunction the distal colon and rectum following certain surgical procedures. Loop ileostomy has recently become more widespread among colorectal surgeons. We compared these 2 procedures when used to defunction the distal colon and rectum. Methods: Subject were 43 patients undergoing closure of a diverting stoma between 1995 and 2000. They were divided into an ileostomy group (n=25; IS group) and a transverse colostomy group (n=18; CS group). Median follow-up was 41 months. Results: Age, gender and indication for surgery were similar in both groups. Between stoma construction and closure, no significant differences were observed except in the method of anastomosis. After stoma closure, significant differences were observed in the incidence of bowel obstruction (IS: 4.0%, CS: 33.3%; P=0.031) and length of postoperative hospital stay (IS: 7.6±2.5days, CS: 10.6±5.0 days; P=0.017). No difference was seen in other complications. Conclusion: These results indicate that the loop ileostomy may be the procedure of choice when a diverting stoma is needed to defunction the distal colon and rectum.
KW - Diverting stoma
KW - Loop ileostomy
KW - Transverse colostomy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0034843398
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0034843398#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.5833/jjgs.34.1395
DO - 10.5833/jjgs.34.1395
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0034843398
SN - 0386-9768
VL - 34
SP - 1395
EP - 1399
JO - Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery
JF - Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery
IS - 9
ER -