TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF for patients with Ewing sarcomas
T2 - a systematic review for the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022 of the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology
AU - Hirose, Takeshi
AU - Ito, Mamoru
AU - Tsuchihashi, Kenji
AU - Ozaki, Yukinori
AU - Nishio, Hiroshi
AU - Ichihara, Eiki
AU - Miura, Yuji
AU - Yano, Shingo
AU - Maruyama, Dai
AU - Yoshinami, Tetsuhiro
AU - Susumu, Nobuyuki
AU - Takekuma, Munetaka
AU - Motohashi, Takashi
AU - Baba, Eishi
AU - Ochi, Nobuaki
AU - Kubo, Toshio
AU - Uchino, Keita
AU - Kimura, Takahiro
AU - Kamiyama, Yutaro
AU - Nakao, Shinji
AU - Tamura, Shinobu
AU - Nishimoto, Hitomi
AU - Kato, Yasuhisa
AU - Sato, Atsushi
AU - Takano, Toshimi
AU - Endo, Makoto
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology 2024.
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Background: Multidrug chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma can lead to severe myelosuppression. We proposed two clinical questions (CQ): CQ #1, “Does primary prophylaxis with G-CSF benefit chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma?” and CQ #2, “Does G-CSF-based intensified chemotherapy improve Ewing sarcoma treatment outcomes?”. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi web databases, including English and Japanese articles published from 1990 to 2019. Two reviewers assessed the extracted papers and analyzed overall survival (OS), febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence, infection-related mortality, quality of life (QOL), and pain. Results: Twenty-five English and five Japanese articles were identified for CQ #1. After screening, a cohort study of vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide chemotherapy with 851 patients was selected. Incidence of FN was 60.8% with G-CSF and 65.8% without; statistical tests were not conducted. Data on OS, infection-related mortality, QOL, or pain was unavailable. Consequently, CQ #1 was redefined as a future research question. As for CQ #2, we found two English and five Japanese papers, of which one high-quality randomized controlled trial on G-CSF use in intensified chemotherapy was included. This trial showed trends toward lower mortality and a significant increase in event-free survival for 2-week interval regimen with the G-CSF primary prophylactic use compared with 3-week interval. Conclusion: This review indicated that G-CSF’s efficacy as primary prophylaxis in Ewing sarcoma, except in children, is uncertain despite its common use. This review tentatively endorses intensified chemotherapy with G-CSF primary prophylaxis for Ewing sarcoma.
AB - Background: Multidrug chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma can lead to severe myelosuppression. We proposed two clinical questions (CQ): CQ #1, “Does primary prophylaxis with G-CSF benefit chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma?” and CQ #2, “Does G-CSF-based intensified chemotherapy improve Ewing sarcoma treatment outcomes?”. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi web databases, including English and Japanese articles published from 1990 to 2019. Two reviewers assessed the extracted papers and analyzed overall survival (OS), febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence, infection-related mortality, quality of life (QOL), and pain. Results: Twenty-five English and five Japanese articles were identified for CQ #1. After screening, a cohort study of vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide chemotherapy with 851 patients was selected. Incidence of FN was 60.8% with G-CSF and 65.8% without; statistical tests were not conducted. Data on OS, infection-related mortality, QOL, or pain was unavailable. Consequently, CQ #1 was redefined as a future research question. As for CQ #2, we found two English and five Japanese papers, of which one high-quality randomized controlled trial on G-CSF use in intensified chemotherapy was included. This trial showed trends toward lower mortality and a significant increase in event-free survival for 2-week interval regimen with the G-CSF primary prophylactic use compared with 3-week interval. Conclusion: This review indicated that G-CSF’s efficacy as primary prophylaxis in Ewing sarcoma, except in children, is uncertain despite its common use. This review tentatively endorses intensified chemotherapy with G-CSF primary prophylaxis for Ewing sarcoma.
KW - Adverse effects
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Ewing sarcoma
KW - Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85196638644
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85196638644#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1007/s10147-024-02572-6
DO - 10.1007/s10147-024-02572-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 38904887
AN - SCOPUS:85196638644
SN - 1341-9625
VL - 29
SP - 1081
EP - 1087
JO - International Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - International Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 8
ER -