TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimation of subepithelial lateral extent in submucosal early gastric cancer
T2 - retrospective histological analysis
AU - Goto, Osamu
AU - Fujimoto, Ai
AU - Shimoda, Masayuki
AU - Ochiai, Yasutoshi
AU - Matsuda, Tatsuo
AU - Takeuchi, Hiroya
AU - Kawakubo, Hirofumi
AU - Maehata, Tadateru
AU - Uraoka, Toshio
AU - Kameyama, Kaori
AU - Kitagawa, Yuko
AU - Yahagi, Naohisa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, The International Gastric Cancer Association and The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.
PY - 2015/10/25
Y1 - 2015/10/25
N2 - Background: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is expected to make possible minimally invasive local resection of early gastric cancer (EGC). However, no consensus exists regarding how far an optimal safety margin should be set in determining the resection area by endoscopy. We aimed to investigate the optimal lateral margin of EGC which could be a candidate for EFTR by measuring the subepithelial extent (SE) of tumors. Methods: In 60 surgically resected submucosal EGCs 4 cm or smaller, 595 prepared slides which showed lateral tumor borders both on the epithelial surface and on the subepithelial layer were assessed. The distance between the epithelial and the subepithelial tumor edge was measured under microscopic observation, followed by analyses of the relationship between the measured SE and the histological characteristics. Results: The average and the median SE were 1.1 mm (standard deviation 1.8 mm) and 0.3 mm (range 0–12.3 mm), respectively. The 99th percentile was 8.8 mm. With regard to the histological type, the median SE was significantly greater in diffuse-type tumor than in intestinal-type tumor (0.9 mm vs 0 mm, p < 0.0001). With regard to the location of the subepithelilal tumor edge, the median SE was significantly greater in the submucosal layer than in the mucosal layer (2.6 mm vs 0.3 mm, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In most lesions, the SE was less than 1 cm. A safety margin may be set at 1 cm in EFTR of submucosal EGC.
AB - Background: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is expected to make possible minimally invasive local resection of early gastric cancer (EGC). However, no consensus exists regarding how far an optimal safety margin should be set in determining the resection area by endoscopy. We aimed to investigate the optimal lateral margin of EGC which could be a candidate for EFTR by measuring the subepithelial extent (SE) of tumors. Methods: In 60 surgically resected submucosal EGCs 4 cm or smaller, 595 prepared slides which showed lateral tumor borders both on the epithelial surface and on the subepithelial layer were assessed. The distance between the epithelial and the subepithelial tumor edge was measured under microscopic observation, followed by analyses of the relationship between the measured SE and the histological characteristics. Results: The average and the median SE were 1.1 mm (standard deviation 1.8 mm) and 0.3 mm (range 0–12.3 mm), respectively. The 99th percentile was 8.8 mm. With regard to the histological type, the median SE was significantly greater in diffuse-type tumor than in intestinal-type tumor (0.9 mm vs 0 mm, p < 0.0001). With regard to the location of the subepithelilal tumor edge, the median SE was significantly greater in the submucosal layer than in the mucosal layer (2.6 mm vs 0.3 mm, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In most lesions, the SE was less than 1 cm. A safety margin may be set at 1 cm in EFTR of submucosal EGC.
KW - Early gastric cancer
KW - Endoscopic full-thickness resection
KW - Subepithelial extent
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942196283&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942196283&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10120-014-0427-2
DO - 10.1007/s10120-014-0427-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 25331983
AN - SCOPUS:84942196283
SN - 1436-3291
VL - 18
SP - 810
EP - 816
JO - Gastric Cancer
JF - Gastric Cancer
IS - 4
ER -