TY - JOUR
T1 - Fundamental precision limit of a Mach-Zehnder interferometric sensor when one of the inputs is the vacuum
AU - Takeoka, Masahiro
AU - Seshadreesan, Kaushik P.
AU - You, Chenglong
AU - Izumi, Shuro
AU - Dowling, Jonathan P.
N1 - Funding Information:
M.T. would like to acknowledge support from the Open Partnership Joint Projects of JSPS Bilateral Joint Research Projects and the ImPACT Program of the Council for Science, Technology and Innovation, Japan. K.P.S. and J.P.D. would like to acknowledge support from the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, the Army Research Office, Defense Advanced Technology Program, the National Science Foundation, and the Northrop Grumman Corporation. C.Y. would like to acknowledge support from an Economic Development Assistantship from the the Louisiana State University System Board of Regents.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Physical Society.
PY - 2017/11/15
Y1 - 2017/11/15
N2 - In the lore of quantum metrology, one often hears (or reads) the following no-go theorem: If you put a vacuum into one input port of a balanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer, then no matter what you put into the other input port, and no matter what your detection scheme, the sensitivity can never be better than the shot-noise limit (SNL). Often the proof of this theorem is cited to be in C. Caves, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693 (1981)0556-282110.1103/PhysRevD.23.1693, but upon further inspection, no such claim is made there. Quantum-Fisher-information-based arguments suggestive of this no-go theorem appear elsewhere in the literature, but are not stated in their full generality. Here we thoroughly explore this no-go theorem and give a rigorous statement: the no-go theorem holds whenever the unknown phase shift is split between both of the arms of the interferometer, but remarkably does not hold when only one arm has the unknown phase shift. In the latter scenario, we provide an explicit measurement strategy that beats the SNL. We also point out that these two scenarios are physically different and correspond to different types of sensing applications.
AB - In the lore of quantum metrology, one often hears (or reads) the following no-go theorem: If you put a vacuum into one input port of a balanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer, then no matter what you put into the other input port, and no matter what your detection scheme, the sensitivity can never be better than the shot-noise limit (SNL). Often the proof of this theorem is cited to be in C. Caves, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693 (1981)0556-282110.1103/PhysRevD.23.1693, but upon further inspection, no such claim is made there. Quantum-Fisher-information-based arguments suggestive of this no-go theorem appear elsewhere in the literature, but are not stated in their full generality. Here we thoroughly explore this no-go theorem and give a rigorous statement: the no-go theorem holds whenever the unknown phase shift is split between both of the arms of the interferometer, but remarkably does not hold when only one arm has the unknown phase shift. In the latter scenario, we provide an explicit measurement strategy that beats the SNL. We also point out that these two scenarios are physically different and correspond to different types of sensing applications.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036644123&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85036644123&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.052118
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.052118
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85036644123
SN - 2469-9926
VL - 96
JO - Physical Review A
JF - Physical Review A
IS - 5
M1 - 052118
ER -