TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of noise reduction on radiation dose reduction potential of virtual monochromatic spectral images
T2 - Comparison of phantom images with conventional 120 kVp images using deep learning image reconstruction and hybrid iterative reconstruction
AU - Masuda, Shota
AU - Yamada, Yoshitake
AU - Minamishima, Kazuya
AU - Owaki, Yoshiki
AU - Yamazaki, Akihisa
AU - Jinzaki, Masahiro
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to express our gratitude to the general managers of the Office of Radiological Technology of Keio University Hospital for their assistance with this study. Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Purpose: To assess the effects of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) on the image quality of virtual monochromatic spectral (VMS) images and to investigate the dose reduction potential of the VMS and conventional 120 kVp images. Methods: A cylindrical phantom simulating an adult abdomen was used. The contrast was set to 60 (medium) and 300 (high) Hounsfield units. CT acquisitions were performed at three dose levels: 12, 9, and 6 mGy. Images were reconstructed via filtered back projection (FBP), DLIR, and HIR. The noise power spectrum (NPS) and task transfer function (TTF) were measured, and the system performance (SP) function was calculated (TTF2/NPS). Results: The noise magnitudes at low spatial frequencies with DLIR and HIR were lower than that with FBP by 45.6% and 24.4%, respectively. Compared to the FBP results, the TTF values at 50% with DLIR at medium and high contrast changed by –13.2% and +25.3% with the VMS images and –2.0% and +9.3% with the 120 kVp images, respectively. In the VMS and 120 kVp images, compared to the SP values of 12 mGy FBP images, SP values of 6 mGy DLIR images decreased at medium contrast and increased at high contrast. Conclusions: DLIR achieved better noise reduction than HIR. The spatial resolution of VMS-DLIR varied significantly depending on the contrast. The image quality of VMS-DLIR and 120 kVp-DLIR potentially decrease in medium contrast tasks and increase in high contrast tasks with 50% dose reduction.
AB - Purpose: To assess the effects of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) on the image quality of virtual monochromatic spectral (VMS) images and to investigate the dose reduction potential of the VMS and conventional 120 kVp images. Methods: A cylindrical phantom simulating an adult abdomen was used. The contrast was set to 60 (medium) and 300 (high) Hounsfield units. CT acquisitions were performed at three dose levels: 12, 9, and 6 mGy. Images were reconstructed via filtered back projection (FBP), DLIR, and HIR. The noise power spectrum (NPS) and task transfer function (TTF) were measured, and the system performance (SP) function was calculated (TTF2/NPS). Results: The noise magnitudes at low spatial frequencies with DLIR and HIR were lower than that with FBP by 45.6% and 24.4%, respectively. Compared to the FBP results, the TTF values at 50% with DLIR at medium and high contrast changed by –13.2% and +25.3% with the VMS images and –2.0% and +9.3% with the 120 kVp images, respectively. In the VMS and 120 kVp images, compared to the SP values of 12 mGy FBP images, SP values of 6 mGy DLIR images decreased at medium contrast and increased at high contrast. Conclusions: DLIR achieved better noise reduction than HIR. The spatial resolution of VMS-DLIR varied significantly depending on the contrast. The image quality of VMS-DLIR and 120 kVp-DLIR potentially decrease in medium contrast tasks and increase in high contrast tasks with 50% dose reduction.
KW - Computed tomography
KW - Deep learning image reconstruction
KW - Dual-energy CT
KW - Hybrid iterative reconstruction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124388693&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124388693&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110198
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110198
M3 - Article
C2 - 35168172
AN - SCOPUS:85124388693
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 149
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
M1 - 110198
ER -