TY - JOUR
T1 - Intermittent Granulocyte and Monocyte Apheresis Versus Mercaptopurine for Maintaining Remission of Ulcerative Colitis
T2 - A Pilot Study
AU - Sakuraba, Atsushi
AU - Sato, Toshiro
AU - Morohoshi, Yuichi
AU - Matsuoka, Katsuyoshi
AU - Okamoto, Susumu
AU - Inoue, Nagamu
AU - Takaishi, Hiromasa
AU - Ogata, Haruhiko
AU - Iwao, Yasushi
AU - Hibi, Toshifumi
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - The effect of granulocyte and monocyte adsorption apheresis (GMA) on prevention of relapse of ulcerative colitis (UC) is not clear. This was a pilot open-labeled, prospective, randomized, unblinded study to compare the tolerability and efficacy of intermittent GMA (once every 2weeks) with mercaptopurine to maintain remission of UC. Twenty-one patients with UC, who had achieved remission by induction therapies were randomly assigned to receive either intermittent GMA (N=10) or oral mercaptopurine (0.5mg/kg per day; N=11). The study period was 24months. The rate of the patients maintaining remission and the incidences of adverse effects were compared between the two groups. At 24months, seven of 10 patients (70.0%) on intermittent GMA and seven of 11 patients (63.6%, P=1.00) on oral mercaptopurine were still in remission. Three patients relapsed in each group. One patient taking mercaptopurine, but none receiving intermittent GMA, dropped out because of adverse effects. Intermittent therapy with GMA was well tolerated and a substantial proportion of patients maintained remission. Intermittent GMA therapy in maintaining remission of UC merits further investigation.
AB - The effect of granulocyte and monocyte adsorption apheresis (GMA) on prevention of relapse of ulcerative colitis (UC) is not clear. This was a pilot open-labeled, prospective, randomized, unblinded study to compare the tolerability and efficacy of intermittent GMA (once every 2weeks) with mercaptopurine to maintain remission of UC. Twenty-one patients with UC, who had achieved remission by induction therapies were randomly assigned to receive either intermittent GMA (N=10) or oral mercaptopurine (0.5mg/kg per day; N=11). The study period was 24months. The rate of the patients maintaining remission and the incidences of adverse effects were compared between the two groups. At 24months, seven of 10 patients (70.0%) on intermittent GMA and seven of 11 patients (63.6%, P=1.00) on oral mercaptopurine were still in remission. Three patients relapsed in each group. One patient taking mercaptopurine, but none receiving intermittent GMA, dropped out because of adverse effects. Intermittent therapy with GMA was well tolerated and a substantial proportion of patients maintained remission. Intermittent GMA therapy in maintaining remission of UC merits further investigation.
KW - Granulocyte and monocyte adsorption apheresis
KW - Maintenance treatment
KW - Mercaptopurine
KW - Ulcerative colitis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861335403&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861335403&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2012.01064.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2012.01064.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 22607563
AN - SCOPUS:84861335403
SN - 1744-9979
VL - 16
SP - 213
EP - 218
JO - Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis
JF - Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis
IS - 3
ER -