TY - JOUR
T1 - Interpretation of diffusion MR imaging data using a gamma distribution model
AU - Oshio, Koichi
AU - Shinmoto, Hiroshi
AU - Mulkern, Robert V.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
PY - 2014/9/29
Y1 - 2014/9/29
N2 - Purpose: Although many models have been proposed to interpret non-Gaussian diffusion MRI data in biological tissues, it is often difficult to see the correlation between the MRI data and the histological changes in the tissue. Among these models, so called statistical models, which assume the diffusion coefficient D is distributed continuously within a voxel, are more suitable for interpreting the data in a histological context than others. In this work, we examined a statistical model based on the gamma distribution.Methods: First, the proposed gamma model, the bi-exponential model, and the truncated Gaussian model were compared for goodness of fit. To evaluate diagnostic capability, area fractions of certain D ranges were evaluated. The area fraction for D < 1.0mm2/s (frac < 1) was attributed to small cancer cells with restricted diffusion, and the area fraction for D > 3.0mm2/s (frac > 3) was considered to reflect perfusion component. A clinical data set of histologically proven prostate cancer cases from previous study was used.Results: For the cancer tissue, the gamma model was better fit than the truncated Gaussian model, and there was no significant difference between the gamma model and the biexponential model. For the normal peripheral zone tissue, there was no significant differences among all models. In the 2D scatter plot of frac < 1 vs. frac > 3, Cancer and noncancer tissues were clearly separated.Conclusion: Using the proposed model, the diffusion MR data was well fit, and histological interpretation of the data appears possible.
AB - Purpose: Although many models have been proposed to interpret non-Gaussian diffusion MRI data in biological tissues, it is often difficult to see the correlation between the MRI data and the histological changes in the tissue. Among these models, so called statistical models, which assume the diffusion coefficient D is distributed continuously within a voxel, are more suitable for interpreting the data in a histological context than others. In this work, we examined a statistical model based on the gamma distribution.Methods: First, the proposed gamma model, the bi-exponential model, and the truncated Gaussian model were compared for goodness of fit. To evaluate diagnostic capability, area fractions of certain D ranges were evaluated. The area fraction for D < 1.0mm2/s (frac < 1) was attributed to small cancer cells with restricted diffusion, and the area fraction for D > 3.0mm2/s (frac > 3) was considered to reflect perfusion component. A clinical data set of histologically proven prostate cancer cases from previous study was used.Results: For the cancer tissue, the gamma model was better fit than the truncated Gaussian model, and there was no significant difference between the gamma model and the biexponential model. For the normal peripheral zone tissue, there was no significant differences among all models. In the 2D scatter plot of frac < 1 vs. frac > 3, Cancer and noncancer tissues were clearly separated.Conclusion: Using the proposed model, the diffusion MR data was well fit, and histological interpretation of the data appears possible.
KW - Bi-exponential model
KW - Diffusion MRI
KW - Non-Gaussian diffusion
KW - Statistical model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908037674&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908037674&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2463/mrms.2014-0016
DO - 10.2463/mrms.2014-0016
M3 - Article
C2 - 25167880
AN - SCOPUS:84908037674
SN - 1347-3182
VL - 13
SP - 191
EP - 195
JO - Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
JF - Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
IS - 3
ER -