TY - JOUR
T1 - Is laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Beneficial for Elderly Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AU - Seishima, Ryo
AU - Okabayashi, Koji
AU - Hasegawa, Hirotoshi
AU - Tsuruta, Masashi
AU - Shigeta, Kohei
AU - Matsui, Shimpei
AU - Yamada, Toru
AU - Kitagawa, Yuko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.
PY - 2015/4
Y1 - 2015/4
N2 - Background: Elderly patients who undergo major abdominal surgery are potentially at a higher risk of perioperative mortality and postoperative complications. Although laparoscopic surgery has been widely accepted as a less invasive surgical procedure for colorectal diseases, the benefits for elderly patients have not been validated. Aim: To compare postoperative outcomes and long-term survival between laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery in the elderly population. Methods: A literature search was electronically performed to identify all studies comparing postoperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open colorectal resections in the elderly population. Primary outcomes were postoperative mortality and complications, and the secondary outcome was long-term survival. Results: Overall, 30 studies (70,946 patients) met our inclusion criteria. Laparoscopic surgery was significantly associated with a decreased risk of perioperative mortality [odds ratio (OR), 0.55; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.45–0.68; P < 0.01] and postoperative complications (OR, 0.55; 95 % CI, 0.48–0.63; P < 0.01) compared with open surgery. There was no significant difference in long-term survival between the two procedures (OR, 0.89; 95 % CI, 0.72–1.07; P = 0.31). Conclusions: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly population has significant advantages in terms of short-term outcomes. Aggressive application of laparoscopic colorectal surgery should be considered for the elderly population.
AB - Background: Elderly patients who undergo major abdominal surgery are potentially at a higher risk of perioperative mortality and postoperative complications. Although laparoscopic surgery has been widely accepted as a less invasive surgical procedure for colorectal diseases, the benefits for elderly patients have not been validated. Aim: To compare postoperative outcomes and long-term survival between laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery in the elderly population. Methods: A literature search was electronically performed to identify all studies comparing postoperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open colorectal resections in the elderly population. Primary outcomes were postoperative mortality and complications, and the secondary outcome was long-term survival. Results: Overall, 30 studies (70,946 patients) met our inclusion criteria. Laparoscopic surgery was significantly associated with a decreased risk of perioperative mortality [odds ratio (OR), 0.55; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.45–0.68; P < 0.01] and postoperative complications (OR, 0.55; 95 % CI, 0.48–0.63; P < 0.01) compared with open surgery. There was no significant difference in long-term survival between the two procedures (OR, 0.89; 95 % CI, 0.72–1.07; P = 0.31). Conclusions: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly population has significant advantages in terms of short-term outcomes. Aggressive application of laparoscopic colorectal surgery should be considered for the elderly population.
KW - Colorectal
KW - Elderly
KW - Laparoscopic surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925488156&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925488156&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11605-015-2748-9
DO - 10.1007/s11605-015-2748-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 25617077
AN - SCOPUS:84925488156
SN - 1091-255X
VL - 19
SP - 756
EP - 765
JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
IS - 4
ER -