抄録
We compared the subtype diagnoses of schizophrenia (ICD-10) of 58 Japanese and 61 European psychiatrists matched for clinical experience using 10 case summaries. As a result, there are marked differences between Japanese and European psychiatrists in the mode of subtype diagnoses of schizophrenia rather than in the clinical pictures of the patients themselves; the hebephrenic type (F20.1) was more likely to be diagnosed by Japanese psychiatrists, while the paranoid type (F20.0) was more frequently diagnosed by European psychiatrists. Japanese psychiatrists take into account the patient's age at onset and the clinical course of the disease in identifying the subtype, while European psychiatrists tend to focus on the presenting symptoms, particularly paranoid symptoms.
| 本文言語 | English |
|---|---|
| ページ(範囲) | 98-106 |
| ページ数 | 9 |
| ジャーナル | Psychopathology |
| 巻 | 32 |
| 号 | 2 |
| DOI | |
| 出版ステータス | Published - 1999 3月 |
UN SDG
この成果は、次の持続可能な開発目標に貢献しています
-
SDG 3 すべての人に健康と福祉を
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- 臨床心理学
- 精神医学および精神衛生
フィンガープリント
「Is paranoid schizophrenia the most common subtype?」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。引用スタイル
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS