TY - JOUR
T1 - Mapping of Lymph Node Metastasis From Esophagogastric Junction Tumors
T2 - A Prospective Nationwide Multicenter Study
AU - Kurokawa, Yukinori
AU - Takeuchi, Hiroya
AU - Doki, Yuichiro
AU - Mine, Shinji
AU - Terashima, Masanori
AU - Yasuda, Takushi
AU - Yoshida, Kazuhiro
AU - Daiko, Hiroyuki
AU - Sakuramoto, Shinichi
AU - Yoshikawa, Takaki
AU - Kunisaki, Chikara
AU - Seto, Yasuyuki
AU - Tamura, Shigeyuki
AU - Shimokawa, Toshio
AU - Sano, Takeshi
AU - Kitagawa, Yuko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/7/1
Y1 - 2021/7/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the optimal extent of lymph node dissection for the 2 histological types of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) tumors based on the incidence of metastasis in a prospective nationwide multicenter study. BACKGROUND: Because most previous studies were retrospective, the optimal surgical procedure for EGJ tumors has not been standardized. METHODS: Patients with cT2-T4 adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma located within 2.0 cm of the EGJ were enrolled before surgery. Surgeons dissected all lymph nodes prespecified in the protocol, using either the abdominal transhiatal or right transthoracic approach. The primary endpoint was the metastasis rate of each lymph node. Lymph nodes were classified according to metastasis rate, as follows: category-1 (strongly recommended for dissection), rate more than 10%; category-2 (weakly recommended for dissection), rate from 5% to 10%; and category-3 (not recommended for dissection), rate less than 5%. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2017, 1065 patients with EGJ tumor were screened, and 371 were enrolled. Among 358 patients who underwent surgical resection, category-1 nodes included abdominal stations 1, 2, 3, 7, 9, and 11p, whereas category-2 nodes included abdominal stations 8a, 19, and lower mediastinal station 110. If esophageal involvement exceeded 2.0 cm, station 110 was assigned to category-1. Among 98 patients who had either adenocarcinoma with esophageal involvement over 3.0 cm or squamous cell carcinoma, there were no category-1 nodes in the upper/middle mediastinal field, whereas category-2 nodes included upper mediastinal station 106recR and middle mediastinal station 108. When esophageal involvement exceeded 4.0 cm, station 106recR was assigned to category-1. CONCLUSION: The study accurately identified the distribution of lymph node metastases from EGJ tumors and the optimal extent of subsequent lymph node dissection.
AB - OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the optimal extent of lymph node dissection for the 2 histological types of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) tumors based on the incidence of metastasis in a prospective nationwide multicenter study. BACKGROUND: Because most previous studies were retrospective, the optimal surgical procedure for EGJ tumors has not been standardized. METHODS: Patients with cT2-T4 adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma located within 2.0 cm of the EGJ were enrolled before surgery. Surgeons dissected all lymph nodes prespecified in the protocol, using either the abdominal transhiatal or right transthoracic approach. The primary endpoint was the metastasis rate of each lymph node. Lymph nodes were classified according to metastasis rate, as follows: category-1 (strongly recommended for dissection), rate more than 10%; category-2 (weakly recommended for dissection), rate from 5% to 10%; and category-3 (not recommended for dissection), rate less than 5%. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2017, 1065 patients with EGJ tumor were screened, and 371 were enrolled. Among 358 patients who underwent surgical resection, category-1 nodes included abdominal stations 1, 2, 3, 7, 9, and 11p, whereas category-2 nodes included abdominal stations 8a, 19, and lower mediastinal station 110. If esophageal involvement exceeded 2.0 cm, station 110 was assigned to category-1. Among 98 patients who had either adenocarcinoma with esophageal involvement over 3.0 cm or squamous cell carcinoma, there were no category-1 nodes in the upper/middle mediastinal field, whereas category-2 nodes included upper mediastinal station 106recR and middle mediastinal station 108. When esophageal involvement exceeded 4.0 cm, station 106recR was assigned to category-1. CONCLUSION: The study accurately identified the distribution of lymph node metastases from EGJ tumors and the optimal extent of subsequent lymph node dissection.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108022017&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85108022017&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003499
DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003499
M3 - Article
C2 - 31404008
AN - SCOPUS:85108022017
SN - 0003-4932
VL - 274
SP - 120
EP - 127
JO - Annals of surgery
JF - Annals of surgery
IS - 1
ER -