TY - JOUR
T1 - Nationwide survey of the follow-up practices for patients with esophageal carcinoma after radical treatment
T2 - historical changes and future perspectives in Japan
AU - Nakanoko, Tomonori
AU - Morita, Masaru
AU - Nakashima, Yuichiro
AU - Ota, Mitsuhiko
AU - Ikebe, Masahiko
AU - Yamamoto, Manabu
AU - Bouoka, Eisuke
AU - Takeuchi, Hiroya
AU - Kitagawa, Yuko
AU - Matsubara, Hisahiro
AU - Doki, Yuichiro
AU - Toh, Yasushi
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank all of the institutions which cooperated to this nationwide survey, Ms. Yuri Miyazaki and Fumi Koto for assistance with preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Japan Esophageal Society.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Background: No post-treatment follow-up methods have been established yet for patients with esophageal carcinoma who undergo radical esophagectomy (Surg) or who show complete response to definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT-CR). The purpose of this study was to investigate the current status of follow-up of the Surg and dCRT-CR patients in Japan, and understand the current reality and problems to establish an optimal follow-up method. Methods: A questionnaire on the follow-up method adopted was sent by e-mail to 124 institutions approved by the Japan Esophageal Society as training institutions for board-certified esophageal surgeons; responses were received from 89 institutions. The data were compared with those obtained by a similar survey conducted in 2014. Results: Follow-up methods markedly varied among institutions. Almost all institutions scheduled computed tomography and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at least once a year up to postoperative year 5 for both the Surg and dCRT-CR groups. At least 70% of the institutions continued follow-up up to postoperative year 10, and this proportion had increased as compared to that reported from the 2014 survey. Only 25–30% of the institutions scheduled follow-up screening for metachronous head and neck cancer for both groups, and the health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) after the treatment were seldom assessed. These trends remained unchanged as compared to those reported from the 2014 survey. Conclusions: The results suggest that the consensus of follow-up protocol could not be established. More attention is required for detection of metachronous cancers and assessment of the HR-QOL. Establishment of a consensus-based follow-up system and verification of its effectiveness are required.
AB - Background: No post-treatment follow-up methods have been established yet for patients with esophageal carcinoma who undergo radical esophagectomy (Surg) or who show complete response to definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT-CR). The purpose of this study was to investigate the current status of follow-up of the Surg and dCRT-CR patients in Japan, and understand the current reality and problems to establish an optimal follow-up method. Methods: A questionnaire on the follow-up method adopted was sent by e-mail to 124 institutions approved by the Japan Esophageal Society as training institutions for board-certified esophageal surgeons; responses were received from 89 institutions. The data were compared with those obtained by a similar survey conducted in 2014. Results: Follow-up methods markedly varied among institutions. Almost all institutions scheduled computed tomography and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at least once a year up to postoperative year 5 for both the Surg and dCRT-CR groups. At least 70% of the institutions continued follow-up up to postoperative year 10, and this proportion had increased as compared to that reported from the 2014 survey. Only 25–30% of the institutions scheduled follow-up screening for metachronous head and neck cancer for both groups, and the health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) after the treatment were seldom assessed. These trends remained unchanged as compared to those reported from the 2014 survey. Conclusions: The results suggest that the consensus of follow-up protocol could not be established. More attention is required for detection of metachronous cancers and assessment of the HR-QOL. Establishment of a consensus-based follow-up system and verification of its effectiveness are required.
KW - Definitive chemoradiotherapy
KW - Esophagectomy
KW - Follow-up
KW - Health-related quality of life
KW - Metachronous multiple cancers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112366318&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85112366318&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10388-021-00869-3
DO - 10.1007/s10388-021-00869-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 34383154
AN - SCOPUS:85112366318
SN - 1612-9059
VL - 19
SP - 69
EP - 76
JO - Esophagus
JF - Esophagus
IS - 1
ER -