TY - JOUR
T1 - Neo-adjuvant therapy or definitive chemoradiotherapy can improve laryngeal preservation rates in patients with cervical esophageal cancer. A Japanese nationwide survey
AU - Kato, Hiroyuki
AU - Kitagawa, Yuko
AU - Kuwano, Hiroyuki
AU - Toh, Yasushi
AU - Kusano, Motoyasu
AU - Oyama, Tuneo
AU - Muto, Manabu
AU - Takeuchi, Hiroya
AU - Doki, Yuichiro
AU - Naomoto, Yoshio
AU - Nemoto, Kenji
AU - Matsubara, Hisahiro
AU - Miyazaki, Tatsuya
AU - Yanagisawa, Akio
AU - Uno, Takashi
AU - Kato, Ken
AU - Yoshida, Masahiro
AU - Kawakubo, Hirofumi
AU - Booka, Eisuke
AU - Nakajima, Masanobu
AU - Kaneko, Koichi
AU - Shiotani, Akihiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, The Japan Esophageal Society and Springer Japan.
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - Background: Various options are available to treat cervical esophageal cancer (CEC), including primary resection, neo-adjuvant therapy followed by surgery, and definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). However, whether neo-adjuvant therapy or dCRT can improve larynx preservation rates in patients with CEC is unclear. This study investigated results of CEC treatment in clinical practice by a nationwide survey in Japan. Patients and methods: We retrospectively investigated results of clinical practices for patients with resectable CEC treated between 2012 and 2014, using a mailed questionnaire as a nationwide survey to 308 institutions recognized by the Japan Esophageal Society and the Japan Broncho-Esophagological Society. Results: We registered 792 patients from 93 institutions, of whom 11.1 % underwent endoscopic resection, 46.0 % underwent surgery, and 39.2 % underwent dCRT. Among patients with CEC who were considered to be poor candidates for laryngeal preservation at initial diagnosis, 24.5 % of the 139 patients treated with neo-adjuvant therapy, and 47.3 % of the 226 patients treated with dCRT preserved their larynxes. Conclusions: This questionnaire survey revealed that multimodality treatment for CEC could decrease laryngectomy rates, especially among patients who were not considered to be laryngeal preservation candidates. These treatment strategies can lead to both laryngeal preservation and postoperative quality of life, and should become more widely used.
AB - Background: Various options are available to treat cervical esophageal cancer (CEC), including primary resection, neo-adjuvant therapy followed by surgery, and definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). However, whether neo-adjuvant therapy or dCRT can improve larynx preservation rates in patients with CEC is unclear. This study investigated results of CEC treatment in clinical practice by a nationwide survey in Japan. Patients and methods: We retrospectively investigated results of clinical practices for patients with resectable CEC treated between 2012 and 2014, using a mailed questionnaire as a nationwide survey to 308 institutions recognized by the Japan Esophageal Society and the Japan Broncho-Esophagological Society. Results: We registered 792 patients from 93 institutions, of whom 11.1 % underwent endoscopic resection, 46.0 % underwent surgery, and 39.2 % underwent dCRT. Among patients with CEC who were considered to be poor candidates for laryngeal preservation at initial diagnosis, 24.5 % of the 139 patients treated with neo-adjuvant therapy, and 47.3 % of the 226 patients treated with dCRT preserved their larynxes. Conclusions: This questionnaire survey revealed that multimodality treatment for CEC could decrease laryngectomy rates, especially among patients who were not considered to be laryngeal preservation candidates. These treatment strategies can lead to both laryngeal preservation and postoperative quality of life, and should become more widely used.
KW - Cervical esophageal cancer
KW - Definitive chemoradiotherapy
KW - Laryngeal preservation
KW - Nationwide survey
KW - Neo-adjuvant therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975700606&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975700606&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10388-016-0528-6
DO - 10.1007/s10388-016-0528-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84975700606
SN - 1612-9059
VL - 13
SP - 276
EP - 282
JO - Esophagus
JF - Esophagus
IS - 3
ER -