TY - JOUR
T1 - Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors and SARS-CoV-2 infection
T2 - an analysis from the veteran's affairs healthcare system
AU - Sandhu, Alexander T.
AU - Kohsaka, Shun
AU - Lin, Shoutzu
AU - Woo, Christopher Y.
AU - Goldstein, Mary K.
AU - Heidenreich, Paul A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by an American Heart Association COVID-19 and Its Cardiovascular Impact Rapid Response Grant (Award # 813396). AS receives research support from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ( 1K23HL151672-01 ).
Funding Information:
This study was approved by the Stanford Institutional Review Board. Analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Our study was funded by the AHA COVID-19 Rapid Response Award and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The authors are solely responsible for the design and conduct of this study, all study analyses, the drafting and editing of the paper and its final contents.
Funding Information:
AS consults for Acumen, LLC. SK reports receiving unrestricted grants from Daiichi Sankyo and Bayer and lecture fees from Bayer and Bristol-Myers Squibb outside the submitted work. Views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Veterans Affairs or other affiliated institutions. The remaining authors (SL, CW, MG, PH) have no disclosures.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Background: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are known to impact the functional receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The association between chronic therapy with these medications and infection risk remains unclear. Objectives: The objective was to determine the association between prior ACEI or ARB therapy and SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients with hypertension in the U.S. Veteran's Affairs health system. Methods: We compared the odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection among three groups: patients treated with ACEI, treated with ARB, or treated with alternate first-line anti-hypertensives without ACEI/ARB. We excluded patients with alternate indications for ACEI or ARB therapy. We performed an augmented inverse propensity weighted analysis with adjustment for demographics, region, comorbidities, vitals, and laboratory values. Results: Among 1,724,723 patients with treated hypertension, 659,180 were treated with ACEI, 310,651 with ARB, and 754,892 with neither. Before weighting, patients treated with ACEI or ARB were more likely to be diabetic and use more anti-hypertensives. There were 13,278 SARS-CoV-2 infections (0.8%) between February 12, 2020 and August 19, 2020. Patients treated with ACEI had lower odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection (odds ratio [OR] 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89-0.97) while those treated with ARB had similar odds (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.96-1.07) compared with patients treated with alternate first-line anti-hypertensives without ACEI/ARB. In falsification analyses, patients on ACEI did not have a difference in their odds of unrelated outcomes. Conclusions: Our results suggest the safety of continuing ACEI and ARB therapy. The association between ACEI therapy and lower odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection requires further investigation.
AB - Background: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are known to impact the functional receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The association between chronic therapy with these medications and infection risk remains unclear. Objectives: The objective was to determine the association between prior ACEI or ARB therapy and SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients with hypertension in the U.S. Veteran's Affairs health system. Methods: We compared the odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection among three groups: patients treated with ACEI, treated with ARB, or treated with alternate first-line anti-hypertensives without ACEI/ARB. We excluded patients with alternate indications for ACEI or ARB therapy. We performed an augmented inverse propensity weighted analysis with adjustment for demographics, region, comorbidities, vitals, and laboratory values. Results: Among 1,724,723 patients with treated hypertension, 659,180 were treated with ACEI, 310,651 with ARB, and 754,892 with neither. Before weighting, patients treated with ACEI or ARB were more likely to be diabetic and use more anti-hypertensives. There were 13,278 SARS-CoV-2 infections (0.8%) between February 12, 2020 and August 19, 2020. Patients treated with ACEI had lower odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection (odds ratio [OR] 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89-0.97) while those treated with ARB had similar odds (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.96-1.07) compared with patients treated with alternate first-line anti-hypertensives without ACEI/ARB. In falsification analyses, patients on ACEI did not have a difference in their odds of unrelated outcomes. Conclusions: Our results suggest the safety of continuing ACEI and ARB therapy. The association between ACEI therapy and lower odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection requires further investigation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110240033&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85110240033&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.06.004
DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.06.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 34126079
AN - SCOPUS:85110240033
SN - 0002-8703
VL - 240
SP - 46
EP - 57
JO - American heart journal
JF - American heart journal
ER -