TY - JOUR
T1 - Review of gender research in cross-cultural psychology since 1990
T2 - Conceptual definitions and methodology
AU - Suzuki, Atsuko
PY - 2004/6
Y1 - 2004/6
N2 - A review of the cross-cultural research on gender in psychology since 1990 reveals (1) conceptual confusion of the definitions of sex, gender, man, and woman; (2) diversification, refinement, reification, and a problem-solving orientation in the research topics; and (3) the possibility of the elucidation of the psychological sex-difference mechanism in relation to the biological sex differences. A comparison of 1990 and 2000 cross-cultural psychological articles published in "Sex Roles" found that overall, the research is Western-centered and some methodological problems remain to be solved concerning the measures and the sampling. These findings lead to the following suggestions for cross-cultural research on gender to resolve the problems and contribute to the development of psychology in general: (1) use of an operational definition for conceptual equivalence; (2) conducting more etic-approach research; (3) avoiding ethnocentric or androcentric research attitudes; (4) use of a theoretical framework; (5) strict examination of methodologies; and (6) examination of the specific context of participants in terms of cultural diversity, dynamics of husband-wife relationships, and relationships with husbands and fathers.
AB - A review of the cross-cultural research on gender in psychology since 1990 reveals (1) conceptual confusion of the definitions of sex, gender, man, and woman; (2) diversification, refinement, reification, and a problem-solving orientation in the research topics; and (3) the possibility of the elucidation of the psychological sex-difference mechanism in relation to the biological sex differences. A comparison of 1990 and 2000 cross-cultural psychological articles published in "Sex Roles" found that overall, the research is Western-centered and some methodological problems remain to be solved concerning the measures and the sampling. These findings lead to the following suggestions for cross-cultural research on gender to resolve the problems and contribute to the development of psychology in general: (1) use of an operational definition for conceptual equivalence; (2) conducting more etic-approach research; (3) avoiding ethnocentric or androcentric research attitudes; (4) use of a theoretical framework; (5) strict examination of methodologies; and (6) examination of the specific context of participants in terms of cultural diversity, dynamics of husband-wife relationships, and relationships with husbands and fathers.
KW - Conceptual definitions
KW - Cross-cultural psychology
KW - Etic and emic approaches
KW - Gender
KW - Methodology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15744384104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=15744384104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4992/jjpsy.75.160
DO - 10.4992/jjpsy.75.160
M3 - Review article
C2 - 15747548
AN - SCOPUS:15744384104
SN - 0021-5236
VL - 75
SP - 160
EP - 172
JO - Shinrigaku Kenkyu
JF - Shinrigaku Kenkyu
IS - 2
ER -