TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety and feasibility of lung biopsy in diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome
T2 - Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Fukuda, Yosuke
AU - Sugimoto, Hiroshi
AU - Yamada, Yoshie
AU - Ito, Hiroyuki
AU - Tanaka, Takeshi
AU - Yoshida, Takuo
AU - Okamori, Satoshi
AU - Ando, Koichi
AU - Okada, Yohei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/2/12
Y1 - 2021/2/12
N2 - Introduction Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a type of acute respiratory failure characterised by non-cardiac pulmonary oedema caused by various underlying conditions. ARDS is often pathologically characterised by diffuse alveolar damage, and its pathological findings have been reported to be associated with prognosis, although the adverse effects of lung biopsies to obtain pathological findings are still unclear. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to reveal the safety and feasibility of lung biopsy in the diagnosis of ARDS. Methods and analysis We will include studies that were published in MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until 1 June 2020. We will include the reports for critically ill patients in an intensive care unit or emergency department who undergo lung biopsy and require a mechanical ventilation. Two review authors will independently scan titles and abstracts of all identified studies. Furthermore, these two authors will read and assess the full text of study reports to identify trials that appeared broadly to address the subject of the review. We will perform a risk of bias assessment using the McMaster Quality Assessment Scale of Harms. Ethics and dissemination This study will be based on the published data, therefore, it does not require ethical approval. The final results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration number UMIN000040650.
AB - Introduction Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a type of acute respiratory failure characterised by non-cardiac pulmonary oedema caused by various underlying conditions. ARDS is often pathologically characterised by diffuse alveolar damage, and its pathological findings have been reported to be associated with prognosis, although the adverse effects of lung biopsies to obtain pathological findings are still unclear. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to reveal the safety and feasibility of lung biopsy in the diagnosis of ARDS. Methods and analysis We will include studies that were published in MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until 1 June 2020. We will include the reports for critically ill patients in an intensive care unit or emergency department who undergo lung biopsy and require a mechanical ventilation. Two review authors will independently scan titles and abstracts of all identified studies. Furthermore, these two authors will read and assess the full text of study reports to identify trials that appeared broadly to address the subject of the review. We will perform a risk of bias assessment using the McMaster Quality Assessment Scale of Harms. Ethics and dissemination This study will be based on the published data, therefore, it does not require ethical approval. The final results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration number UMIN000040650.
KW - adult intensive & critical care
KW - adult thoracic medicine
KW - thoracic medicine
KW - thoracic surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101429409&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101429409&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043600
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043600
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33579770
AN - SCOPUS:85101429409
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 11
JO - BMJ open
JF - BMJ open
IS - 2
M1 - e043600
ER -