TY - JOUR
T1 - Sentinel node mapping for gastric cancer
T2 - A prospective multicenter trial in Japan
AU - Kitagawa, Yuko
AU - Takeuchi, Hiroya
AU - Takagi, Yu
AU - Natsugoe, Shoji
AU - Terashima, Masanori
AU - Murakami, Nozomu
AU - Fujimura, Takashi
AU - Tsujimoto, Hironori
AU - Hayashi, Hideki
AU - Yoshimizu, Nobunari
AU - Takagane, Akinori
AU - Mohri, Yasuhiko
AU - Nabeshima, Kazuhito
AU - Uenosono, Yoshikazu
AU - Kinami, Shinichi
AU - Sakamoto, Junichi
AU - Morita, Satoshi
AU - Aikou, Takashi
AU - Miwa, Koichi
AU - Kitajima, Masaki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2013 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2013/10/10
Y1 - 2013/10/10
N2 - Purpose: Complicated gastric lymphatic drainage potentially undermines the utility of sentinel node (SN) biopsy in patients with gastric cancer. Encouraged by several favorable single-institution reports, we conducted a multicenter, single-arm, phase II study of SN mapping that used a standardized dual tracer endoscopic injection technique. Patients and Methods: Patients with previously untreated cT1 or cT2 gastric adenocarcinomas < 4 cm in gross diameter were eligible for inclusion in this study. SN mapping was performed by using a standardized dual tracer endoscopic injection technique. Following biopsy of the identified SNs, mandatory comprehensive D2 or modified D2 gastrectomy was performed according to current Japanese Gastric Cancer Association guidelines. Results: Among 433 patients who gave preoperative consent, 397 were deemed eligible on the basis of surgical findings. SN biopsy was performed in all patients, and the SN detection rate was 97.5% (387 of 397). Of 57 patients with lymph node metastasis by conventional hematoxylin and eosin staining, 93% (53 of 57) had positive SNs, and the accuracy of nodal evaluation for metastasis was 99% (383 of 387). Only four false-negative SN biopsies were observed, and pathologic analysis revealed that three of those biopsies were pT2 or tumors > 4 cm. We observed no serious adverse effects related to endoscopic tracer injection or the SN mapping procedure. Conclusion: The endoscopic dual tracer method for SN biopsy was confirmed as safe and effective when applied to the superficial, relatively small gastric adenocarcinomas included in this study.
AB - Purpose: Complicated gastric lymphatic drainage potentially undermines the utility of sentinel node (SN) biopsy in patients with gastric cancer. Encouraged by several favorable single-institution reports, we conducted a multicenter, single-arm, phase II study of SN mapping that used a standardized dual tracer endoscopic injection technique. Patients and Methods: Patients with previously untreated cT1 or cT2 gastric adenocarcinomas < 4 cm in gross diameter were eligible for inclusion in this study. SN mapping was performed by using a standardized dual tracer endoscopic injection technique. Following biopsy of the identified SNs, mandatory comprehensive D2 or modified D2 gastrectomy was performed according to current Japanese Gastric Cancer Association guidelines. Results: Among 433 patients who gave preoperative consent, 397 were deemed eligible on the basis of surgical findings. SN biopsy was performed in all patients, and the SN detection rate was 97.5% (387 of 397). Of 57 patients with lymph node metastasis by conventional hematoxylin and eosin staining, 93% (53 of 57) had positive SNs, and the accuracy of nodal evaluation for metastasis was 99% (383 of 387). Only four false-negative SN biopsies were observed, and pathologic analysis revealed that three of those biopsies were pT2 or tumors > 4 cm. We observed no serious adverse effects related to endoscopic tracer injection or the SN mapping procedure. Conclusion: The endoscopic dual tracer method for SN biopsy was confirmed as safe and effective when applied to the superficial, relatively small gastric adenocarcinomas included in this study.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891589158&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891589158&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.3789
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.3789
M3 - Article
C2 - 24019550
AN - SCOPUS:84891589158
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 31
SP - 3704
EP - 3710
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 29
ER -