TY - JOUR
T1 - Strategyproof Allocation Mechanisms with Endowments and M-convex Distributional Constraints
AU - Suzuki, Takamasa
AU - Tamura, Akihisa
AU - Yahiro, Kentaro
AU - Yokoo, Makoto
AU - Zhang, Yuzhe
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP20H00609 , JP21H04979 and JP22K19813 .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - We consider an allocation problem of multiple types of objects to agents, where each type of object has multiple copies (e.g., multiple seats in a school), each agent is endowed with an object, and some distributional constraints are imposed on the allocation (e.g., minimum/maximum quotas). We develop two mechanisms that are strategyproof, feasible (they always satisfy distributional constraints), and individually rational, assuming the distributional constraints are represented by an M-convex set. One mechanism, based on Top Trading Cycles, is Pareto efficient; the other, which belongs to the mechanism class specified by Kojima et al. [1], satisfies a relaxed fairness requirement. The class of distributional constraints we consider contains many situations raised from realistic matching problems, including individual minimum/maximum quotas, regional maximum quotas, type-specific quotas, and distance constraints. Finally, we experimentally evaluate the performance of these mechanisms by a computer simulation.
AB - We consider an allocation problem of multiple types of objects to agents, where each type of object has multiple copies (e.g., multiple seats in a school), each agent is endowed with an object, and some distributional constraints are imposed on the allocation (e.g., minimum/maximum quotas). We develop two mechanisms that are strategyproof, feasible (they always satisfy distributional constraints), and individually rational, assuming the distributional constraints are represented by an M-convex set. One mechanism, based on Top Trading Cycles, is Pareto efficient; the other, which belongs to the mechanism class specified by Kojima et al. [1], satisfies a relaxed fairness requirement. The class of distributional constraints we consider contains many situations raised from realistic matching problems, including individual minimum/maximum quotas, regional maximum quotas, type-specific quotas, and distance constraints. Finally, we experimentally evaluate the performance of these mechanisms by a computer simulation.
KW - Controlled school choice
KW - Deferred acceptance
KW - Distributional constraints
KW - M-convex set
KW - Strategyproofness
KW - Top trading cycles
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142830520&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85142830520&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.artint.2022.103825
DO - 10.1016/j.artint.2022.103825
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85142830520
SN - 0004-3702
VL - 315
JO - Artificial Intelligence
JF - Artificial Intelligence
M1 - 103825
ER -